Unauthorized intelligence? Investigating AI use among undergraduate students toward curriculum redesign

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are now embedded in students' everyday academic practices, making bans neither realistic nor pedagogically desirable. The central challenge for higher education is therefore not whether to use AI, but how to redesign teaching so that AI enhances learning without replacing the effortful cognitive work required to build disciplinary competence. This study examines how undergraduate students and instructors at a large public university in the United Arab Emirates engage with AI in a context where most courses have not yet been revised to incorporate these tools. Using a mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 705 undergraduate students and 136 instructors across all colleges. Quantitative analyses examined the prevalence, frequency, and purposes of AI use, while qualitative responses explored ethical awareness, perceived boundaries of acceptable use, and pedagogical readiness. Results indicate widespread student use of AI for summarizing, writing, proofreading, laboratory tasks, and coding, alongside uneven understanding of when such use becomes unauthorized. Instructors reported high awareness of student AI use but inconsistent course-level policies, resulting in fragmented expectations. Both groups expressed strong support for integrating AI into the curriculum. The study argues that a stand-alone AI literacy course is insufficient. Instead, it calls for systematic, curriculum-wide reform in which each course clearly defines AI-permitted and AI-restricted tasks and incorporates strictly invigilated, AI-free assessments to ensure that foundational skills are developed before AI assistance is allowed. This approach would enable universities to adopt AI while safeguarding disciplinary learning, academic integrity, and students’ cognitive development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103033
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unauthorized intelligence? Investigating AI use among undergraduate students toward curriculum redesign

Akmal Nazir
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Unauthorized intelligence? Investigating AI use among undergraduate students toward curriculum redesign

Akmal Nazir
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are now embedded in students' everyday academic practices, making bans neither realistic nor pedagogically desirable. The central challenge for higher education is therefore not whether to use AI, but how to redesign teaching so that AI enhances learning without replacing the effortful cognitive work required to build disciplinary competence. This study examines how undergraduate students and instructors at a large public university in the United Arab Emirates engage with AI in a context where most courses have not yet been revised to incorporate these tools. Using a mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 705 undergraduate students and 136 instructors across all colleges. Quantitative analyses examined the prevalence, frequency, and purposes of AI use, while qualitative responses explored ethical awareness, perceived boundaries of acceptable use, and pedagogical readiness. Results indicate widespread student use of AI for summarizing, writing, proofreading, laboratory tasks, and coding, alongside uneven understanding of when such use becomes unauthorized. Instructors reported high awareness of student AI use but inconsistent course-level policies, resulting in fragmented expectations. Both groups expressed strong support for integrating AI into the curriculum. The study argues that a stand-alone AI literacy course is insufficient. Instead, it calls for systematic, curriculum-wide reform in which each course clearly defines AI-permitted and AI-restricted tasks and incorporates strictly invigilated, AI-free assessments to ensure that foundational skills are developed before AI assistance is allowed. This approach would enable universities to adopt AI while safeguarding disciplinary learning, academic integrity, and students’ cognitive development.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 13
United Arab Emirates University (AE)
United Arab Emirates University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.