Modeling distress in cancer patients using a fuzzy logic approach based on expert consensus

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a fuzzy logic model based on expert consensus to elucidate distress dynamics in cancer patients, examining the non-linear interactions between psychological, social, and medical factors. METHODS: A two-round Delphi process with 23 psychosocial oncology experts was conducted to generate an interaction matrix of 18 distress-related variables. Using the skfuzzy Python library, a Mamdani fuzzy inference system was constructed, focusing on Negative Psychological Factors, Symptoms, and Positive Psychological Factors as primary drivers. Model validation included network analysis, time-series simulations, and sensitivity analyses, compared against a traditional crisp system dynamics model. RESULTS: The fuzzy model confirmed a self-reinforcing "vicious cycle" of distress driven by Negative Psychological Factors (weight = 2.00) and Symptoms (weight = 1.50). Simulations demonstrated that positive psychological interventions could reduce overall distress levels by up to 25%. Network analysis identified distress as a central system hub, while the fuzzy model produced smoother, more clinically realistic trajectories than the crisp model. CONCLUSION: This study provides a robust mathematical explanation for the success of the validated DIC-2 clinical tool. The results underscore the necessity of early, multidisciplinary interventions to disrupt distress cycles, supporting the clinical shift toward treating distress as the "sixth vital sign".

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04431-2
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling distress in cancer patients using a fuzzy logic approach based on expert consensus

Bejoy Thomas, Anushk Pandey, Manoj Pandey
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Modeling distress in cancer patients using a fuzzy logic approach based on expert consensus

Bejoy Thomas, Anushk Pandey, Manoj Pandey
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a fuzzy logic model based on expert consensus to elucidate distress dynamics in cancer patients, examining the non-linear interactions between psychological, social, and medical factors. METHODS: A two-round Delphi process with 23 psychosocial oncology experts was conducted to generate an interaction matrix of 18 distress-related variables. Using the skfuzzy Python library, a Mamdani fuzzy inference system was constructed, focusing on Negative Psychological Factors, Symptoms, and Positive Psychological Factors as primary drivers. Model validation included network analysis, time-series simulations, and sensitivity analyses, compared against a traditional crisp system dynamics model. RESULTS: The fuzzy model confirmed a self-reinforcing "vicious cycle" of distress driven by Negative Psychological Factors (weight = 2.00) and Symptoms (weight = 1.50). Simulations demonstrated that positive psychological interventions could reduce overall distress levels by up to 25%. Network analysis identified distress as a central system hub, while the fuzzy model produced smoother, more clinically realistic trajectories than the crisp model. CONCLUSION: This study provides a robust mathematical explanation for the success of the validated DIC-2 clinical tool. The results underscore the necessity of early, multidisciplinary interventions to disrupt distress cycles, supporting the clinical shift toward treating distress as the "sixth vital sign".

World Journal of Surgical Oncology
University of Calgary (CA), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Brooklyn College (US), Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN), Banaras Hindu University (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.