The Dark Side of Empathy and Organization Studies

Empathy is widely celebrated as a leadership skill and moral virtue. We agree that empathy is central to social connection, but argue that it is not inherently virtuous. To understand its impacts on organizations, we must move beyond individual-centric views of empathy and instead see it as a relational phenomenon embedded in power relations. Drawing on psychology, feminist theory, political science, and anthropology, we identify four often repressed dark sides of empathy. Distress from somatic empathy exposes the embodied costs of engaging with others’ suffering. Disparity persists through the empathy tax, as the burden of emotional labour falls disproportionately on women. Division persists through preferential empathy, privileging those we identify with while excluding others. Deception arises from tactical empathy, using emotional insight manipulatively. Together, these dark sides expose empathy as an organizing force marked by uneven distributions, contested purposes, and ambivalent consequences. We bring attention to these fundamental tensions in empathy, yet resist campaigns to discredit it. Instead, we propose relational empathy as a way of understanding its complex, power-laden nature.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Organization Studies
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406261459079
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Dark Side of Empathy and Organization Studies

Elisabeth Naima Mikkelsen, Joana Geraldi, Stewart Clegg
Organization Studies
Management and Organizational Studies
article

The Dark Side of Empathy and Organization Studies

Elisabeth Naima Mikkelsen, Joana Geraldi, Stewart Clegg
article en

Abstract

Empathy is widely celebrated as a leadership skill and moral virtue. We agree that empathy is central to social connection, but argue that it is not inherently virtuous. To understand its impacts on organizations, we must move beyond individual-centric views of empathy and instead see it as a relational phenomenon embedded in power relations. Drawing on psychology, feminist theory, political science, and anthropology, we identify four often repressed dark sides of empathy. Distress from somatic empathy exposes the embodied costs of engaging with others’ suffering. Disparity persists through the empathy tax, as the burden of emotional labour falls disproportionately on women. Division persists through preferential empathy, privileging those we identify with while excluding others. Deception arises from tactical empathy, using emotional insight manipulatively. Together, these dark sides expose empathy as an organizing force marked by uneven distributions, contested purposes, and ambivalent consequences. We bring attention to these fundamental tensions in empathy, yet resist campaigns to discredit it. Instead, we propose relational empathy as a way of understanding its complex, power-laden nature.

Organization Studies
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.