Hazard Structure Dominates Data in Estimating the Long-Horizon Probability of Existential Collapse: A Bayesian Phase-Type Analysis of P(1000)

We ask a deliberately ill-posed question—“what is the probability that human civilization suffersan unrecoverable collapse within 1000 years?”—and show that any defensible answer is determinedmore by the assumed shape of the hazard function than by available evidence. Working ina survival-analytic framework with rates expressed per century, we compare three hazard structures:a time-of-perils model, a phase-type competing-risks continuous-time Markov chain, andan endogenous causal model whose hazard is a functional of latent capability/governance trajectories.We place a correlated joint prior over the rate parameters (via a one-factor Gaussianmodel on the log-rates), anchor the only empirically identified quantity—the natural backgroundrate—to the survival-based bound of [SOB19], and convert the prior pushforward into a genuineposterior by conditioning on elicited extinction-by-2100 forecasts from the Existential RiskPersuasion Tournament [Kar+23] through a hierarchical (partial-pooling) likelihood, sampledby the No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS) with full convergence diagnostics (ˆR = 1.00). The phasetyperepresentation yields the full first-passage law of collapse, not merely its terminal mass; aleave-one-survey-out analysis quantifies sensitivity to each elicited group; an explicit constructvalidityparameter κ relating elicited extinction to modelled collapse reveals an identifiabilitylimit (posterior ≈ prior); and a prior-loading sensitivity sweep and posterior predictive checksconfirm robustness. Across structures, the posterior median of P(1000) ranges from ≈ 0.01(post-alignment) to ≈ 0.49 (causal, observational), a spread that exceeds the within-model posteriorwidth and is generated almost entirely by structural choice. We argue that any singlequoted figure for long-horizon existential risk is best read as a statement about the modeller’sstructural prior rather than as a measurement, and we make the analysis fully reproducible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20453488
Primary Topic
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Hazard Structure Dominates Data in Estimating the Long-Horizon Probability of Existential Collapse: A Bayesian Phase-Type Analysis of P(1000)

Alfredo Sepulveda-Jimenez
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
preprint

Hazard Structure Dominates Data in Estimating the Long-Horizon Probability of Existential Collapse: A Bayesian Phase-Type Analysis of P(1000)

Alfredo Sepulveda-Jimenez
preprint en

Abstract

We ask a deliberately ill-posed question—“what is the probability that human civilization suffersan unrecoverable collapse within 1000 years?”—and show that any defensible answer is determinedmore by the assumed shape of the hazard function than by available evidence. Working ina survival-analytic framework with rates expressed per century, we compare three hazard structures:a time-of-perils model, a phase-type competing-risks continuous-time Markov chain, andan endogenous causal model whose hazard is a functional of latent capability/governance trajectories.We place a correlated joint prior over the rate parameters (via a one-factor Gaussianmodel on the log-rates), anchor the only empirically identified quantity—the natural backgroundrate—to the survival-based bound of [SOB19], and convert the prior pushforward into a genuineposterior by conditioning on elicited extinction-by-2100 forecasts from the Existential RiskPersuasion Tournament [Kar+23] through a hierarchical (partial-pooling) likelihood, sampledby the No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS) with full convergence diagnostics (ˆR = 1.00). The phasetyperepresentation yields the full first-passage law of collapse, not merely its terminal mass; aleave-one-survey-out analysis quantifies sensitivity to each elicited group; an explicit constructvalidityparameter κ relating elicited extinction to modelled collapse reveals an identifiabilitylimit (posterior ≈ prior); and a prior-loading sensitivity sweep and posterior predictive checksconfirm robustness. Across structures, the posterior median of P(1000) ranges from ≈ 0.01(post-alignment) to ≈ 0.49 (causal, observational), a spread that exceeds the within-model posteriorwidth and is generated almost entirely by structural choice. We argue that any singlequoted figure for long-horizon existential risk is best read as a statement about the modeller’sstructural prior rather than as a measurement, and we make the analysis fully reproducible.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
QED Labs (US)
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.