Temporal work and the power to delay: How organizations negotiate climate change

How do organizations navigate the tension between climate action and entrenched business interests? Our 4.5-year ethnographic study of an energy company examines hidden power dynamics and temporal practices that shape corporate sustainability efforts. Our analysis shows that “practicing time,” that is, actively mediating between past legacies and future ambitions, is not merely a matter of scheduling or planning. Rather, it constitutes a contested arena in which organizational actors negotiate change. We identify three distinct temporal work practices—temporal confirming, temporal compromising, and temporal borrowing—each shaped by shifting dominance between organizational units. Power constellations between units influence how actors (can) engage in temporal work, while, in turn, temporal work itself can be seen as a way of exercising power. In so doing, our study highlights how powerful units draw on temporal practices to delay change, while less powerful units leverage shifts in the salience of internal and external sustainability pressures to accelerate sustainability actions. By uncovering how temporal work and shifting power entrenchment can either accelerate or delay climate action. We highlight how time and power dynamics shape corporate responses to climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Relations
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267261451156
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal work and the power to delay: How organizations negotiate climate change

Tobias Gutmann, Karin Kreutzer, Oliver Hirschfelder
Human Relations
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Temporal work and the power to delay: How organizations negotiate climate change

Tobias Gutmann, Karin Kreutzer, Oliver Hirschfelder
article en

Abstract

How do organizations navigate the tension between climate action and entrenched business interests? Our 4.5-year ethnographic study of an energy company examines hidden power dynamics and temporal practices that shape corporate sustainability efforts. Our analysis shows that “practicing time,” that is, actively mediating between past legacies and future ambitions, is not merely a matter of scheduling or planning. Rather, it constitutes a contested arena in which organizational actors negotiate change. We identify three distinct temporal work practices—temporal confirming, temporal compromising, and temporal borrowing—each shaped by shifting dominance between organizational units. Power constellations between units influence how actors (can) engage in temporal work, while, in turn, temporal work itself can be seen as a way of exercising power. In so doing, our study highlights how powerful units draw on temporal practices to delay change, while less powerful units leverage shifts in the salience of internal and external sustainability pressures to accelerate sustainability actions. By uncovering how temporal work and shifting power entrenchment can either accelerate or delay climate action. We highlight how time and power dynamics shape corporate responses to climate change.

Human Relations
EBS University of Business and Law (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.