Occlusal Dysesthesia: Identifying Knowledge Gaps to Advance Clinical Care

BACKGROUND: Occlusal dysesthesia (OD) is a debilitating condition characterized by persistent occlusal discomfort in the absence of detectable occlusal abnormalities. Despite decades of clinical recognition, OD remains poorly understood, frequently misdiagnosed and inconsistently managed. OBJECTIVE: To map the existing literature on OD, identify conceptual and mechanistic knowledge gaps, and outline research priorities to advance understanding and improve clinical care. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Seven electronic databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) were searched for English-language publications from 1976 to January 2026. Eligible sources included clinical studies, case reports/series, reviews, book chapters, and editorials addressing abnormal occlusal perception not attributable to structural pathology. Two reviewers independently screened records and full texts, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. RESULTS: Forty-six articles were included. The literature was dominated by non-empirical reports. Most clinical research studies originated from Japan. Psychophysical studies did not demonstrate altered occlusal discrimination thresholds in individuals with OD, while psychological distress and depressive symptoms were consistently reported. Limited neuroimaging evidence suggested altered central processing, particularly involving prefrontal regions. No validated diagnostic criteria or standardized management strategies were identified. CONCLUSION: Available evidence supports conceptualizing OD as a heterogeneous condition involving altered central processing and occlusal perception rather than a primary occlusal abnormality. Rigorous multidisciplinary and multimodal research integrating psychophysics, psychological assessment, and advanced neuroimaging is urgently needed to improve education and inform evidence-based diagnosis and management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70224
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occlusal Dysesthesia: Identifying Knowledge Gaps to Advance Clinical Care

Iacopo Cioffi, S Esmat, Helen He
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Occlusal Dysesthesia: Identifying Knowledge Gaps to Advance Clinical Care

Iacopo Cioffi, S Esmat, Helen He
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Occlusal dysesthesia (OD) is a debilitating condition characterized by persistent occlusal discomfort in the absence of detectable occlusal abnormalities. Despite decades of clinical recognition, OD remains poorly understood, frequently misdiagnosed and inconsistently managed. OBJECTIVE: To map the existing literature on OD, identify conceptual and mechanistic knowledge gaps, and outline research priorities to advance understanding and improve clinical care. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Seven electronic databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) were searched for English-language publications from 1976 to January 2026. Eligible sources included clinical studies, case reports/series, reviews, book chapters, and editorials addressing abnormal occlusal perception not attributable to structural pathology. Two reviewers independently screened records and full texts, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. RESULTS: Forty-six articles were included. The literature was dominated by non-empirical reports. Most clinical research studies originated from Japan. Psychophysical studies did not demonstrate altered occlusal discrimination thresholds in individuals with OD, while psychological distress and depressive symptoms were consistently reported. Limited neuroimaging evidence suggested altered central processing, particularly involving prefrontal regions. No validated diagnostic criteria or standardized management strategies were identified. CONCLUSION: Available evidence supports conceptualizing OD as a heterogeneous condition involving altered central processing and occlusal perception rather than a primary occlusal abnormality. Rigorous multidisciplinary and multimodal research integrating psychophysics, psychological assessment, and advanced neuroimaging is urgently needed to improve education and inform evidence-based diagnosis and management.

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
University of Toronto (CA), Discovery Centre (CA), Centre for Social Innovation (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.