Association Between Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events (PREVENT) Risk Scores and Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease: Insights From the Project Baseline Health Study

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events risk scores estimate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, including heart failure (HF) and atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) events. Whether they associate with subclinical CVD in an asymptomatic community population is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed 1138 participants from the multicenter PBHS (Project Baseline Health Study) cohort, who underwent echocardiography and coronary artery calcium scoring and were free of known CVD. Subclinical CVD was defined as the presence of subclinical HF or subclinical coronary artery disease. Subclinical HF included left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, or low ejection fraction (<50%). Subclinical coronary artery disease was defined as coronary artery calcium >0. Predicting Risk of CVD Events 10-year risk score associations with subclinical CVD were assessed using logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Median age was 52 (41-64) years; 64% were White; and 57% were women. Subclinical HF was found in 182 (16%) participants, predominantly with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (14%). Diastolic dysfunction prevalence increased from 5.8% in low-risk HF groups to 44.1% in intermediate-/high-risk HF groups. Each unit increase in 10-year HF risk corresponded to 2.67-fold higher odds of diastolic dysfunction (95% CI, 2.25-3.18; area under the curve, 0.81). Subclinical coronary artery disease was present in 466 (41%) participants, with prevalence increasing from 28.5% in low-risk ASCVD groups to 79.3% in intermediate-/high-risk ASCVD groups. Each unit increase in 10-year ASCVD risk was associated with 2.91-fold higher odds of any coronary calcification (95% CI, 2.54-3.35; area under the curve, 0.80), increasing to 4.76-fold for coronary artery calcium >100 (95% CI, 3.70-6.12; area under the curve, 0.86) and 5.60-fold for coronary artery calcium >300 (95% CI, 3.89-8.05; area under the curve, 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: In an asymptomatic CVD-free community sample, subclinical CVD was increasingly associated with higher 10-year HF and ASCVD risks calculated by the Predicting Risk of CVD Events equations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.045753
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association Between Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events (PREVENT) Risk Scores and Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease: Insights From the Project Baseline Health Study

Nicholas Cauwenberghs, Diona Gjermeni, D M Maron, Tatiana Kusnetsova et al.
1 citations
Journal of the American Heart Association
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
13.74
article

Association Between Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events (PREVENT) Risk Scores and Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease: Insights From the Project Baseline Health Study

Nicholas Cauwenberghs, Diona Gjermeni, D M Maron, Tatiana Kusnetsova, Shadi P. Bagherzadeh, Melissa A. Daubert, SH Shah, Kevin M. Alexander, K W Mahaffey, Michael Salerno, Gracia Fahed, F Haddad, Bettia E. Celestin, Pamela S. Douglas, Fatima Rodriguez, Everton J. Santana
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events risk scores estimate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, including heart failure (HF) and atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) events. Whether they associate with subclinical CVD in an asymptomatic community population is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed 1138 participants from the multicenter PBHS (Project Baseline Health Study) cohort, who underwent echocardiography and coronary artery calcium scoring and were free of known CVD. Subclinical CVD was defined as the presence of subclinical HF or subclinical coronary artery disease. Subclinical HF included left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, or low ejection fraction (<50%). Subclinical coronary artery disease was defined as coronary artery calcium >0. Predicting Risk of CVD Events 10-year risk score associations with subclinical CVD were assessed using logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Median age was 52 (41-64) years; 64% were White; and 57% were women. Subclinical HF was found in 182 (16%) participants, predominantly with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (14%). Diastolic dysfunction prevalence increased from 5.8% in low-risk HF groups to 44.1% in intermediate-/high-risk HF groups. Each unit increase in 10-year HF risk corresponded to 2.67-fold higher odds of diastolic dysfunction (95% CI, 2.25-3.18; area under the curve, 0.81). Subclinical coronary artery disease was present in 466 (41%) participants, with prevalence increasing from 28.5% in low-risk ASCVD groups to 79.3% in intermediate-/high-risk ASCVD groups. Each unit increase in 10-year ASCVD risk was associated with 2.91-fold higher odds of any coronary calcification (95% CI, 2.54-3.35; area under the curve, 0.80), increasing to 4.76-fold for coronary artery calcium >100 (95% CI, 3.70-6.12; area under the curve, 0.86) and 5.60-fold for coronary artery calcium >300 (95% CI, 3.89-8.05; area under the curve, 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: In an asymptomatic CVD-free community sample, subclinical CVD was increasingly associated with higher 10-year HF and ASCVD risks calculated by the Predicting Risk of CVD Events equations.

Journal of the American Heart Association
Duke University (US), University of California System (US), Stanford University (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
13.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.