Screening cognitive and academic problems in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Validity and reliability of the Kempenhaeghe Learning Questionnaire

Background: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) patients are at an increased risk for cognitive and academic difficulties. However, a comprehensive tool to measure DMD-specific learning and academic functioning has been lacking. To address this, we developed the Kempenhaeghe Learning Questionnaire (KLQ) Objective: This study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the KLQ in a large sample of individuals with DMD ( n = 271, mean age 10, standard deviation 3) across five European countries. Methods: The KLQ is a 20-item proxy-report questionnaire based on existing instruments, designed to screen for problems in four cognitive and academic areas in DMD: Reading, Arithmetic, Memory/Attention, and Executive Functioning. Data analysis involved a principal component analysis to identify the KLQ's factor structure and a confirmatory factor analysis to verify this structure. Reliability and validity were assessed to determine the psychometric quality. Results: Factor analyses revealed four distinct but correlated dimensions of cognitive functioning and academic challenges in DMD, confirming a robust four-factor model for the KLQ. The questionnaire demonstrated good psychometric quality. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the KLQ is a useful and clinically informative, brief parent-report tool that can help clinicians identify DMD-specific key cognitive and academic challenges, with a specific focus on school-related areas such as reading, arithmetic, memory, attention, and executive functioning. While this targeted scope limits its use for assessing broader aspects of cognition, it can provide valuable insights in taking care decisions, including determining whether specialised (neuro)psychological assessment is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22143602261433149
Primary Topic
Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Screening cognitive and academic problems in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Validity and reliability of the Kempenhaeghe Learning Questionnaire

Volker Straub, C. Geagan, Sylvia Klinkenberg, Elizabeth Vroom et al.
Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases
Muscle Physiology and Disorders
article

Screening cognitive and academic problems in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Validity and reliability of the Kempenhaeghe Learning Questionnaire

Volker Straub, C. Geagan, Sylvia Klinkenberg, Elizabeth Vroom, David Skuse, Daniella Chieffo, Anna Kolesnik, Isabelle Desguerre, R Jeroen Vermeulen, Anna Wuergler Slipsager, Francesco Muntoni, Ruben Miranda, Erik H Niks, Eugenio Mercuri, Pien MM Weerkamp, Jos GM Hendriksen
article en

Abstract

Background: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) patients are at an increased risk for cognitive and academic difficulties. However, a comprehensive tool to measure DMD-specific learning and academic functioning has been lacking. To address this, we developed the Kempenhaeghe Learning Questionnaire (KLQ) Objective: This study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the KLQ in a large sample of individuals with DMD ( n = 271, mean age 10, standard deviation 3) across five European countries. Methods: The KLQ is a 20-item proxy-report questionnaire based on existing instruments, designed to screen for problems in four cognitive and academic areas in DMD: Reading, Arithmetic, Memory/Attention, and Executive Functioning. Data analysis involved a principal component analysis to identify the KLQ's factor structure and a confirmatory factor analysis to verify this structure. Reliability and validity were assessed to determine the psychometric quality. Results: Factor analyses revealed four distinct but correlated dimensions of cognitive functioning and academic challenges in DMD, confirming a robust four-factor model for the KLQ. The questionnaire demonstrated good psychometric quality. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the KLQ is a useful and clinically informative, brief parent-report tool that can help clinicians identify DMD-specific key cognitive and academic challenges, with a specific focus on school-related areas such as reading, arithmetic, memory, attention, and executive functioning. While this targeted scope limits its use for assessing broader aspects of cognition, it can provide valuable insights in taking care decisions, including determining whether specialised (neuro)psychological assessment is warranted.

Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Rigshospitalet (DK), Maastricht University (NL), Duchenne Parent Project (NL), Kempenhaeghe (NL), Institut des Maladies Génétiques Imagine (FR), University College London (GB), Catholic University of America (US), Newcastle University (GB)
Fourth Framework Programme
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Muscle Physiology and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.