Psychometric Evaluation of the HSCL-10 Burmese Version as a Screening Tool for Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms among Adult Burmese Refugees

PURPOSE: This study examines the psychometric properties of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-10 (HSCL-10) among Burmese refugee adults resettled in the United States (U.S.). Although widely used to screen for anxiety and depression, the HSCL-10 has not been validated in Burmese refugee populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study employed a cross-sectional quantitative design with a sample of 217 Burmese refugee adults. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) examined the underlying factor structure of the HLSC-10, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess model fit. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and divergent validity was evaluated using the WHO-5 Index, a global well-being scale. RESULTS: < .082); GFI = 0.961; NFI = 0.937; TLI = 0.984; CFI = 0.988; and RMSEA = 0.040 [0.001-0.068]). The HSCL-D and HSCL-A showed significant inverse correlations with the WHO-5 Well-Being Index, supporting divergent validity. DISCUSSION: Findings support the two-factor structure of the HSCL-10 and provide evidence of acceptable internal consistency and divergent validity in a Burmese refugee sample. These results extend prior research and contribute to the limited literature on its use in Burmese refugee populations. CONCLUSION: The HSCL-10 demonstrates promising psychometric properties and preliminary evidence of validity for assessing anxiety and depressive symptoms among Burmese refugee adults, and may be useful in both clinical and research settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2026.2682547
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the HSCL-10 Burmese Version as a Screening Tool for Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms among Adult Burmese Refugees

Kareen N. Tonsing
Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the HSCL-10 Burmese Version as a Screening Tool for Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms among Adult Burmese Refugees

Kareen N. Tonsing
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examines the psychometric properties of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-10 (HSCL-10) among Burmese refugee adults resettled in the United States (U.S.). Although widely used to screen for anxiety and depression, the HSCL-10 has not been validated in Burmese refugee populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study employed a cross-sectional quantitative design with a sample of 217 Burmese refugee adults. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) examined the underlying factor structure of the HLSC-10, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess model fit. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and divergent validity was evaluated using the WHO-5 Index, a global well-being scale. RESULTS: < .082); GFI = 0.961; NFI = 0.937; TLI = 0.984; CFI = 0.988; and RMSEA = 0.040 [0.001-0.068]). The HSCL-D and HSCL-A showed significant inverse correlations with the WHO-5 Well-Being Index, supporting divergent validity. DISCUSSION: Findings support the two-factor structure of the HSCL-10 and provide evidence of acceptable internal consistency and divergent validity in a Burmese refugee sample. These results extend prior research and contribute to the limited literature on its use in Burmese refugee populations. CONCLUSION: The HSCL-10 demonstrates promising psychometric properties and preliminary evidence of validity for assessing anxiety and depressive symptoms among Burmese refugee adults, and may be useful in both clinical and research settings.

Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work
Oakland University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.