Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Back pain knowledge and beliefs survey (BacKS) for the Brazilian population

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a highly prevalent and disabling health condition worldwide. A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) to assess people's knowledge and beliefs about LBP was recently developed in Australia, but a Brazilian-Portuguese translation is not yet available. The lack of adequate cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires is a barrier to developing LBP research and clinical practice in different cultures. OBJECTIVE: To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and test the measurement properties of the Back pain Knowledge and beliefs Survey (BacKS) to allow its use with Portuguese-speaking Brazilians with LBP (BacKS-BR). METHODS: A forward and backward translation was performed, and measurement properties of the BacKS-BR were assessed following the COSMIN guidelines. Pilot testing was performed to assess content validity and online surveys were undertaken to assess other measurement properties. Structural validity was evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and cross-cultural validity by multigroup CFA. Construct validity was assessed by correlation between BacKS-BR and the Back Beliefs Questionnaire and a positive moderate correlation was expected. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha, reliability by intra-class correlation coefficient, and measurement error by calculating the smallest detectable change (SDC). RESULTS: BacKS-BR had good content validity and the 2-factors structure was confirmed. Multigroup CFA produced acceptable measurement invariance. Pearson test confirmed our construct validity hypothesis (0.59). Internal consistency and reliability were adequate (>0.70) and SDC was 11.09 for total scale. CONCLUSION: The BacKS was successfully translated into Brazilian-Portuguese and proved to have adequate measurement properties. Its use is recommended for research and clinical purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2026.101600
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Back pain knowledge and beliefs survey (BacKS) for the Brazilian population

Stephanie Mathieson, Ben J.S. Darlow, Louise Acalantis Pereira Pires Fernandes, Tatiane Silva et al.
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Back pain knowledge and beliefs survey (BacKS) for the Brazilian population

Stephanie Mathieson, Ben J.S. Darlow, Louise Acalantis Pereira Pires Fernandes, Tatiane Silva, Simon D. French, Leticia Amaral Corrêa, Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira, Mark J. Hancock, Bruno Saragiotto
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a highly prevalent and disabling health condition worldwide. A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) to assess people's knowledge and beliefs about LBP was recently developed in Australia, but a Brazilian-Portuguese translation is not yet available. The lack of adequate cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires is a barrier to developing LBP research and clinical practice in different cultures. OBJECTIVE: To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and test the measurement properties of the Back pain Knowledge and beliefs Survey (BacKS) to allow its use with Portuguese-speaking Brazilians with LBP (BacKS-BR). METHODS: A forward and backward translation was performed, and measurement properties of the BacKS-BR were assessed following the COSMIN guidelines. Pilot testing was performed to assess content validity and online surveys were undertaken to assess other measurement properties. Structural validity was evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and cross-cultural validity by multigroup CFA. Construct validity was assessed by correlation between BacKS-BR and the Back Beliefs Questionnaire and a positive moderate correlation was expected. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha, reliability by intra-class correlation coefficient, and measurement error by calculating the smallest detectable change (SDC). RESULTS: BacKS-BR had good content validity and the 2-factors structure was confirmed. Multigroup CFA produced acceptable measurement invariance. Pearson test confirmed our construct validity hypothesis (0.59). Internal consistency and reliability were adequate (>0.70) and SDC was 11.09 for total scale. CONCLUSION: The BacKS was successfully translated into Brazilian-Portuguese and proved to have adequate measurement properties. Its use is recommended for research and clinical purposes.

Brazilian Journal of Physical TherapyVol. 30(4)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), University Center Augusto Motta (BR), Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (BR), Institute for Musculoskeletal Health (AU), University of Otago (NZ), Macquarie University (AU)
Macquarie University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.