Proactive against reactive therapy for the prevention of lichen sclerosus exacerbation and progression of disease – a pragmatic, parallel group randomised controlled trial with embedded economic evaluation and process evaluation
<ns3:p> Background Vulval lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory condition predominantly affecting female anogenital skin. It causes distressing symptoms that impact on daily living/quality of life (QOL), as well as causing progressive anatomical changes and increased cancer risk. First-line treatment with a very strong topical corticosteroid (TCS) brings LS into remission in around 70%. It is unclear how best to treat LS long-term. The PEARLS trial (ProactivE Against Reactive treatment for Lichen Sclerosus) will answer the research question <ns3:bold>:</ns3:bold> In people ≥5 years old with vulval LS, is maintenance treatment with a TCS twice weekly (‘proactive therapy’) better than as required treatment (‘reactive therapy’) for reducing number of flares over 12-months? </ns3:p>
Authors
- Toyin Bello (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3121-3290)
- Tess McPherson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-0302)
- Clare Baumhauer
- Simi Sudhakaran
- Sophie Rees (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4399-2049)
- Hugh Jarrett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7374-3700)
- Tina Griffin
- Jane Daniels
- Vanitha Sivalingam
- Rosalind Simpson
- Kim Thomas
- Tracey Sach
- Sarah Hillman
- Reuben Ogollah
Institutions
- Birmingham City University (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- House of Representatives (NL)
- At Bristol (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Liverpool Women's Hospital (GB)
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- Southampton City Council (GB)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- NIHR Open Research
- Published
- 2026-05-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14222.1
- Primary Topic
- Genital Health and Disease
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00