The Locus of Discourse Analysis in Policy Analysis: A Critical and Applied Reappraisal

This paper reassesses policy analysis through discourse analysis, showing how language shapes social realities, power relations, and policy outcomes. While grounded in theory, it adopts a clearer methodological and applied focus, presenting discourse analysis as a practical tool for policy inquiry and design rather than a purely abstract exercise. The article uses a structured interpretive review and cross-case synthesis of major scholarship and policy controversies, including climate change, immigration, pandemic response, Brexit, education reform, drug policy, and caregiving policy. Across these cases, it explores how policy problems are framed, how narratives gain authority, which actors are legitimized or marginalized, and how discourse narrows or expands acceptable policy options. The paper engages debates over positivist versus interpretive analysis, practicality, and the relationship among discourse, evidence, and power. It concludes by offering a practical framework for analysts and policymakers to support more reflexive, inclusive, equitable, and effective governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Social Science
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244261451190
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Locus of Discourse Analysis in Policy Analysis: A Critical and Applied Reappraisal

Kwangseon Hwang
Journal of Applied Social Science
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

The Locus of Discourse Analysis in Policy Analysis: A Critical and Applied Reappraisal

Kwangseon Hwang
article en

Abstract

This paper reassesses policy analysis through discourse analysis, showing how language shapes social realities, power relations, and policy outcomes. While grounded in theory, it adopts a clearer methodological and applied focus, presenting discourse analysis as a practical tool for policy inquiry and design rather than a purely abstract exercise. The article uses a structured interpretive review and cross-case synthesis of major scholarship and policy controversies, including climate change, immigration, pandemic response, Brexit, education reform, drug policy, and caregiving policy. Across these cases, it explores how policy problems are framed, how narratives gain authority, which actors are legitimized or marginalized, and how discourse narrows or expands acceptable policy options. The paper engages debates over positivist versus interpretive analysis, practicality, and the relationship among discourse, evidence, and power. It concludes by offering a practical framework for analysts and policymakers to support more reflexive, inclusive, equitable, and effective governance.

Journal of Applied Social Science
Gachon University (KR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.