Cognitive and metacognitive markers of memory retrieval performance in speech prosody

Prosodic cues in speech - such as F0, intensity, and articulation rate - have been shown to be related to cognitive processes, including memory retrieval. Here we examine whether subtle variations in spoken responses to cues in a paired-associates learning task differentially reflect (a) the availability of the memory trace and (b) the learner's confidence in the response. We asked 40 participants to complete a learning task with spoken retrieval attempts followed by confidence ratings. The acoustic properties of their speech, including F0, intensity, and articulation rate, were analyzed and related to the collected confidence ratings. Results showed that intensity was indicative of objective recall performance (indicative of memory trace availability), while F0 and articulation rate were primarily related to speakers' confidence ratings (indicative of underlying certainty about the response). To evaluate these relationships more formally, we compared three structural equation models reflecting competing accounts: one in which prosody primarily indexes memory strength, one in which it primarily indexes confidence, and a hybrid model in which different features map onto distinct processes. Model comparisons favored the hybrid account, suggesting that intensity is more closely linked to memory strength, whereas F0 and articulation rate track confidence. These findings align with the idea that memory performance and metamemory processes affect distinct prosodic features in speech at separate time points during an utterance. Practically, they suggest that real-time analysis of speech prosody can infer cognitive and metacognitive states without explicit input from the speaker, offering promising applications for speech and memory research as well as educational technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memory & Cognition
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-026-01896-0
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive and metacognitive markers of memory retrieval performance in speech prosody

Florian Sense, Thomas Wilschut, Hedderik van Rijn
Memory & Cognition
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Cognitive and metacognitive markers of memory retrieval performance in speech prosody

Florian Sense, Thomas Wilschut, Hedderik van Rijn
article en

Abstract

Prosodic cues in speech - such as F0, intensity, and articulation rate - have been shown to be related to cognitive processes, including memory retrieval. Here we examine whether subtle variations in spoken responses to cues in a paired-associates learning task differentially reflect (a) the availability of the memory trace and (b) the learner's confidence in the response. We asked 40 participants to complete a learning task with spoken retrieval attempts followed by confidence ratings. The acoustic properties of their speech, including F0, intensity, and articulation rate, were analyzed and related to the collected confidence ratings. Results showed that intensity was indicative of objective recall performance (indicative of memory trace availability), while F0 and articulation rate were primarily related to speakers' confidence ratings (indicative of underlying certainty about the response). To evaluate these relationships more formally, we compared three structural equation models reflecting competing accounts: one in which prosody primarily indexes memory strength, one in which it primarily indexes confidence, and a hybrid model in which different features map onto distinct processes. Model comparisons favored the hybrid account, suggesting that intensity is more closely linked to memory strength, whereas F0 and articulation rate track confidence. These findings align with the idea that memory performance and metamemory processes affect distinct prosodic features in speech at separate time points during an utterance. Practically, they suggest that real-time analysis of speech prosody can infer cognitive and metacognitive states without explicit input from the speaker, offering promising applications for speech and memory research as well as educational technologies.

Memory & Cognition
University of Groningen (NL), Defense Engineering Corporation (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.