On the Birth of Modern Chemistry: II—The Difficult Path of Avogadro’s Hypothesis Until Cannizzaro’s Full Acceptance Within the Atomic–Molecular Theory

This paper reviews the significant steps of the atomic–molecular theory, after Avogadro’s intimation of the equal volume/equal number of particles hypothesis until the final assertion embodied in Cannizzaro’s Sunto. Berzelius’s atomism, authoritatively present among chemists in the first decades of nineteenth century, is outlined. Applying volume theory, atomic weights were determined and later revised considering heat capacity experiments on solid elements and the law of isomorphism. The peculiar traits of Berzelius’s atomism are (a) the restricted validity of Avogadro’s hypothesis to only elementary gases, and (b) the opposition to the existence of elementary polyatomic molecules. Next, Dumas’ experiments on vapors are described, aimed at supporting Avogadro’s hypothesis, whose perplexing results were ingeniously resolved by Gaudin assuming that the elementary molecules may contain unequal numbers of component atoms. In the fifth decade of the century, Gerhardt and Laurent established molecular formulae with reference to standard volumes. Finally, at the end of the sixth decade, Cannizzaro published Sunto di un Corso di Filosofia Chimica, in which he fully acknowledges Avogadro’s hypothesis, together with all its implications, and describes how to arrive at molecular and atomic weights from gaseous densities. A brief account of the Karlsruhe congress is included, emphasizing the scientific personality of Cannizzaro.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Histories
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/histories6020035
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Birth of Modern Chemistry: II—The Difficult Path of Avogadro’s Hypothesis Until Cannizzaro’s Full Acceptance Within the Atomic–Molecular Theory

Pier Remigio Salvi
Histories
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

On the Birth of Modern Chemistry: II—The Difficult Path of Avogadro’s Hypothesis Until Cannizzaro’s Full Acceptance Within the Atomic–Molecular Theory

Pier Remigio Salvi
article en

Abstract

This paper reviews the significant steps of the atomic–molecular theory, after Avogadro’s intimation of the equal volume/equal number of particles hypothesis until the final assertion embodied in Cannizzaro’s Sunto. Berzelius’s atomism, authoritatively present among chemists in the first decades of nineteenth century, is outlined. Applying volume theory, atomic weights were determined and later revised considering heat capacity experiments on solid elements and the law of isomorphism. The peculiar traits of Berzelius’s atomism are (a) the restricted validity of Avogadro’s hypothesis to only elementary gases, and (b) the opposition to the existence of elementary polyatomic molecules. Next, Dumas’ experiments on vapors are described, aimed at supporting Avogadro’s hypothesis, whose perplexing results were ingeniously resolved by Gaudin assuming that the elementary molecules may contain unequal numbers of component atoms. In the fifth decade of the century, Gerhardt and Laurent established molecular formulae with reference to standard volumes. Finally, at the end of the sixth decade, Cannizzaro published Sunto di un Corso di Filosofia Chimica, in which he fully acknowledges Avogadro’s hypothesis, together with all its implications, and describes how to arrive at molecular and atomic weights from gaseous densities. A brief account of the Karlsruhe congress is included, emphasizing the scientific personality of Cannizzaro.

HistoriesVol. 6(2)
University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.