Early Language Development in Infants and Toddlers with Hemato-Oncological Diseases: Preliminary Outcomes of a Shared Reading Intervention

Introduction: Children diagnosed with hemato-oncological cancers need intensive medical treatments and prolonged hospitalizations, which are associated with increased risk of impairment across multiple neurodevelopmental domains, particularly when exposure occurs within the first three years of life. Objective: This pilot study aimed to explore early language performance in children under 36 months of age hospitalized in a pediatric hemato-oncology unit and to preliminarily investigate changes over time and potential associations with an early speech–language stimulation intervention based on shared reading. Specifically, the study investigated differences between language comprehension and production, as well as variations in linguistic outcomes according to gender and pathology type (liquid vs. solid). Methods: The study employed a sample of 29 children aged 2 to 36 months (M = 20.76, SD = 9.52). Baseline linguistic assessment was conducted using observational measures across multiple language domains, including lexical development (PinG), morphosyntactic abilities (PCGO, GALS), and articulatory skills (BAMF), together with an evaluation of general cognitive functioning (Griffiths). The intervention consisted of in-person shared reading sessions combined with concurrent parental counseling. Exploratory analyses were performed to examine changes over time and group-related differences. Results: Among the sample, lexical comprehension exceeded production (p < 0.001). Sex differences emerged only for lexical comprehension, with males performing worse than females (p = 0.048). Comparisons by diagnosis showed that children with solid tumors had significantly better articulation than those with hematologic malignancies (p = 0.018), with a trend toward higher morphosyntactic production. Longitudinal analyses on 13 children re-evaluated after six months of weekly shared reading intervention showed potential improvements in articulation, lexical production, and morphosyntactic production (all p < 0.01). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that children in pediatric hemato-oncology settings may be vulnerable to expressive language difficulties. Shared reading interventions may represent a promising supportive approach for early language stimulation; however, further studies with larger samples and controlled designs are needed to better understand their potential contribution and effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases14060193
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Language Development in Infants and Toddlers with Hemato-Oncological Diseases: Preliminary Outcomes of a Shared Reading Intervention

Silvia Sorbara, Alessandra Biffi, Roberta Maria Incardona, Marta Tremolada et al.
Diseases
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Early Language Development in Infants and Toddlers with Hemato-Oncological Diseases: Preliminary Outcomes of a Shared Reading Intervention

Silvia Sorbara, Alessandra Biffi, Roberta Maria Incardona, Marta Tremolada, Giusy Melcarne, Giulia Marangon
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Children diagnosed with hemato-oncological cancers need intensive medical treatments and prolonged hospitalizations, which are associated with increased risk of impairment across multiple neurodevelopmental domains, particularly when exposure occurs within the first three years of life. Objective: This pilot study aimed to explore early language performance in children under 36 months of age hospitalized in a pediatric hemato-oncology unit and to preliminarily investigate changes over time and potential associations with an early speech–language stimulation intervention based on shared reading. Specifically, the study investigated differences between language comprehension and production, as well as variations in linguistic outcomes according to gender and pathology type (liquid vs. solid). Methods: The study employed a sample of 29 children aged 2 to 36 months (M = 20.76, SD = 9.52). Baseline linguistic assessment was conducted using observational measures across multiple language domains, including lexical development (PinG), morphosyntactic abilities (PCGO, GALS), and articulatory skills (BAMF), together with an evaluation of general cognitive functioning (Griffiths). The intervention consisted of in-person shared reading sessions combined with concurrent parental counseling. Exploratory analyses were performed to examine changes over time and group-related differences. Results: Among the sample, lexical comprehension exceeded production (p < 0.001). Sex differences emerged only for lexical comprehension, with males performing worse than females (p = 0.048). Comparisons by diagnosis showed that children with solid tumors had significantly better articulation than those with hematologic malignancies (p = 0.018), with a trend toward higher morphosyntactic production. Longitudinal analyses on 13 children re-evaluated after six months of weekly shared reading intervention showed potential improvements in articulation, lexical production, and morphosyntactic production (all p < 0.01). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that children in pediatric hemato-oncology settings may be vulnerable to expressive language difficulties. Shared reading interventions may represent a promising supportive approach for early language stimulation; however, further studies with larger samples and controlled designs are needed to better understand their potential contribution and effectiveness.

DiseasesVol. 14(6)
University of Padua (IT), Associazione Italiana Vulvodinia Onlus (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.