Understanding Differences in Swimming Velocity and Propulsive Force in the Butterfly Stroke: A Comparison Between Male and Female Butterfly Swimmers Through Discrete and Continuous Variables

Abstract Pinto, MP, Neiva, HP, Sampaio, T, Oliveira, JP, Barbosa, TM, Marinho, DA, and Morais, JE. Understanding differences in swimming velocity and propulsive force in the butterfly stroke: A comparison between male and female butterfly swimmers through discrete and continuous variables. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—The aim of this study was to verify differences in swimming velocity and propulsive force (PF) between male and female swimmers in the butterfly stroke based on discrete variables and Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM—continuous variables). The sample comprised 20 young national-level swimmers (10 boys with 17.9 ± 1.2 years and 10 girls with 15.5 ± 1.4 years). Swimming velocity, intracyclic variation of swimming velocity, stroke frequency, stroke length, stroke index, and PF were measured as discrete variables. Swimming velocity and PF were also measured as continuous variables with SPM. As a discrete variable, swimming velocity presented significant differences between sexes with very large effect sizes ( p < 0.001, d = 2.46). The average PF also presented significant differences between sexes with very large effect sizes ( p < 0.001, d = 2.01). Male swimmers were faster and generated greater PF than female swimmers. As for SPM, velocity presented significant differences between sexes ( t = 3.355, p < 0.001) between ∼31 and ∼56% of the stroke cycle. This corresponds mainly to the end of the pull and most of the push phase. PF followed the same trend, with differences in the same phase of the time series. SPM allowed for identification where, within the stroke cycle, differences between sexes occurred in velocity and PF. Being in the same phase of the time series highlights the existing velocity–PF relationship. SPM can allow researchers and coaches to pinpoint the exact moments within the stroke cycle where differences between swimmers may occur.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005520
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Differences in Swimming Velocity and Propulsive Force in the Butterfly Stroke: A Comparison Between Male and Female Butterfly Swimmers Through Discrete and Continuous Variables

Daniel A. Marinho, Tatiana Sampaio, João P. Oliveira, Henrique P. Neiva et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

Understanding Differences in Swimming Velocity and Propulsive Force in the Butterfly Stroke: A Comparison Between Male and Female Butterfly Swimmers Through Discrete and Continuous Variables

Daniel A. Marinho, Tatiana Sampaio, João P. Oliveira, Henrique P. Neiva, Jorge E. Morais, Tiago M. Barbosa, Mafalda P. Pinto
article en

Abstract

Abstract Pinto, MP, Neiva, HP, Sampaio, T, Oliveira, JP, Barbosa, TM, Marinho, DA, and Morais, JE. Understanding differences in swimming velocity and propulsive force in the butterfly stroke: A comparison between male and female butterfly swimmers through discrete and continuous variables. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—The aim of this study was to verify differences in swimming velocity and propulsive force (PF) between male and female swimmers in the butterfly stroke based on discrete variables and Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM—continuous variables). The sample comprised 20 young national-level swimmers (10 boys with 17.9 ± 1.2 years and 10 girls with 15.5 ± 1.4 years). Swimming velocity, intracyclic variation of swimming velocity, stroke frequency, stroke length, stroke index, and PF were measured as discrete variables. Swimming velocity and PF were also measured as continuous variables with SPM. As a discrete variable, swimming velocity presented significant differences between sexes with very large effect sizes ( p < 0.001, d = 2.46). The average PF also presented significant differences between sexes with very large effect sizes ( p < 0.001, d = 2.01). Male swimmers were faster and generated greater PF than female swimmers. As for SPM, velocity presented significant differences between sexes ( t = 3.355, p < 0.001) between ∼31 and ∼56% of the stroke cycle. This corresponds mainly to the end of the pull and most of the push phase. PF followed the same trend, with differences in the same phase of the time series. SPM allowed for identification where, within the stroke cycle, differences between sexes occurred in velocity and PF. Being in the same phase of the time series highlights the existing velocity–PF relationship. SPM can allow researchers and coaches to pinpoint the exact moments within the stroke cycle where differences between swimmers may occur.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
University of Beira Interior (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.