Mental health determinants, stigma, and disparities among indigenous communities in Bangladesh: A narrative review

Background Indigenous communities in Bangladesh experience substantial mental health inequities shaped by stigma, structural deprivation, and culturally unsafe care, particularly in the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) and tea-garden settlements Methods We conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed empirical studies indexed in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Google, and BanglaJOL (inception to 10 December 2025). We documented study identification and screening using a PRISMA 2020-style flow diagram for transparency (without claiming a systematic review) and synthesized findings using a socio-ecological framework (individual, interpersonal, community, and structural levels) Results Thirteen studies met inclusion. Community-based screening studies commonly reported elevated anxiety and depression (often ∼47–59%), with variability by ethnicity, setting, and measurement tool. Across studies, key determinants and barriers clustered at multiple levels: individual distress and comorbidity; interpersonal/family dynamics and gendered stigma; community-level language loss, discrimination, and explanatory models of illness; and structural constraints including geographic isolation, costs, limited services, and cultural-linguistic discordance Conclusions The evidence consistently indicates a high burden and large treatment gap. Priorities include culturally safe, community-based outreach; co-designed anti-stigma and literacy interventions; language access and cultural mediation in frontline services; and financing and governance reforms that reduce geographic and financial barriers and ethically strengthen disaggregated equity monitoring. Limitations: Evidence is dominated by cross-sectional designs, convenience sampling, and instruments with limited cultural/linguistic adaptation, constraining causal inference and generalizability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geopsychiatry
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geopsy.2026.100096
Primary Topic
Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental health determinants, stigma, and disparities among indigenous communities in Bangladesh: A narrative review

Atiqul Haq Mazumder, S M Yasir Arafat, Juha Veijola
Geopsychiatry
Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
article

Mental health determinants, stigma, and disparities among indigenous communities in Bangladesh: A narrative review

Atiqul Haq Mazumder, S M Yasir Arafat, Juha Veijola
article en

Abstract

Background Indigenous communities in Bangladesh experience substantial mental health inequities shaped by stigma, structural deprivation, and culturally unsafe care, particularly in the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) and tea-garden settlements Methods We conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed empirical studies indexed in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Google, and BanglaJOL (inception to 10 December 2025). We documented study identification and screening using a PRISMA 2020-style flow diagram for transparency (without claiming a systematic review) and synthesized findings using a socio-ecological framework (individual, interpersonal, community, and structural levels) Results Thirteen studies met inclusion. Community-based screening studies commonly reported elevated anxiety and depression (often ∼47–59%), with variability by ethnicity, setting, and measurement tool. Across studies, key determinants and barriers clustered at multiple levels: individual distress and comorbidity; interpersonal/family dynamics and gendered stigma; community-level language loss, discrimination, and explanatory models of illness; and structural constraints including geographic isolation, costs, limited services, and cultural-linguistic discordance Conclusions The evidence consistently indicates a high burden and large treatment gap. Priorities include culturally safe, community-based outreach; co-designed anti-stigma and literacy interventions; language access and cultural mediation in frontline services; and financing and governance reforms that reduce geographic and financial barriers and ethically strengthen disaggregated equity monitoring. Limitations: Evidence is dominated by cross-sectional designs, convenience sampling, and instruments with limited cultural/linguistic adaptation, constraining causal inference and generalizability.

GeopsychiatryVol. 3
Faculty of Public Health (GB), Biomedical Research Foundation (BD), University of Oulu (FI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.