A transparent workflow for future EnergyPlus Weather (EPW) files for building energy simulation

Introduction: Building performance assessments frequently rely on historical weather files that do not represent future climatic conditions, introducing uncertainty and risk for long-lived buildings and low-carbon design decisions. This paper presents a transparent and replicable method to generate future EnergyPlus Weather (EPW) files by morphing a baseline EPW file, derived from typical meteorological year (TMY) datasets representative of recent historical climate conditions, using monthly climate anomalies derived from a Global Climate Model (GCM). Materials and methods: The proposed workflow integrates an automated routine that extracts climate anomalies for any geographic location through inverse-distance weighting of the four nearest GCM grid points, followed by variable-specific shift and stretch transformations and psychrometric post-processing to preserve internal consistency among EPW parameters. The method is demonstrated for two climatically and geographically contrasting locations—Exeter (UK) and Bahía Blanca (Argentina)—using a 2080 time horizon (multi-decadal average centred on the 2080s), allowing evaluation across different hemispheres and climate regimes. Results: Generated time series are benchmarked against available future weather datasets for the selected regions (PROMETHEUS, Meteonorm, and Future Weather Generator). For dry-bulb temperature, the proposed approach shows strong agreement in temporal behaviour with reference data, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.744 to 0.799 (p < 0.05). For Exeter, the method reproduces the expected warming signal, with annual maximum dry-bulb temperatures increasing from approximately 27.0 °C to 31.6 °C and minimum dry-bulb temperatures shifting from −4.4 °C to −2.5 °C relative to the baseline. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that morphing coupled with globally available climate projections can provide practical, location-agnostic future EPW files suitable for early-stage design and sensitivity analyses, while highlighting the importance of baseline weather data quality and climate-model resolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academia green energy.
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20935/acadenergy8325
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A transparent workflow for future EnergyPlus Weather (EPW) files for building energy simulation

Marco Marengo, Marco Picco, Mattia Reolon
Academia green energy.
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

A transparent workflow for future EnergyPlus Weather (EPW) files for building energy simulation

Marco Marengo, Marco Picco, Mattia Reolon
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Building performance assessments frequently rely on historical weather files that do not represent future climatic conditions, introducing uncertainty and risk for long-lived buildings and low-carbon design decisions. This paper presents a transparent and replicable method to generate future EnergyPlus Weather (EPW) files by morphing a baseline EPW file, derived from typical meteorological year (TMY) datasets representative of recent historical climate conditions, using monthly climate anomalies derived from a Global Climate Model (GCM). Materials and methods: The proposed workflow integrates an automated routine that extracts climate anomalies for any geographic location through inverse-distance weighting of the four nearest GCM grid points, followed by variable-specific shift and stretch transformations and psychrometric post-processing to preserve internal consistency among EPW parameters. The method is demonstrated for two climatically and geographically contrasting locations—Exeter (UK) and Bahía Blanca (Argentina)—using a 2080 time horizon (multi-decadal average centred on the 2080s), allowing evaluation across different hemispheres and climate regimes. Results: Generated time series are benchmarked against available future weather datasets for the selected regions (PROMETHEUS, Meteonorm, and Future Weather Generator). For dry-bulb temperature, the proposed approach shows strong agreement in temporal behaviour with reference data, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.744 to 0.799 (p < 0.05). For Exeter, the method reproduces the expected warming signal, with annual maximum dry-bulb temperatures increasing from approximately 27.0 °C to 31.6 °C and minimum dry-bulb temperatures shifting from −4.4 °C to −2.5 °C relative to the baseline. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that morphing coupled with globally available climate projections can provide practical, location-agnostic future EPW files suitable for early-stage design and sensitivity analyses, while highlighting the importance of baseline weather data quality and climate-model resolution.

Academia green energy.Vol. 3(2)
University of Lancashire (GB), University of Pavia (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.