Drivers and functional consequences of covering in a pervasive marine grazer (green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis)

BACKGROUND: The circumpolar green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, exhibits a fascinating behaviour, termed "covering", which consists of coating the body with materials collected in the environment. The lack of a consensus about the drivers of covering in green sea urchin and their relative importance prevents accurate predictions about the frequency and intensity of the behaviour and its functional consequences in a globally changing ocean climate. We paired an experiment in an oscillatory wave tank with green sea urchins collected from an extensive sea urchin barren in southeastern Newfoundland (Canada), and a 3-mo survey of this barrens, to examine individual and interactive effects of wave action, light, sea urchin body size, and types of covering materials on sea urchin's displacement and covering. RESULTS: Our findings establish that covering in S. droebachiensis is: (a) predominantly controlled by hydrodynamic forces, with the existence of water current-induced covering tipping points; (b) ontogenetically determined, with a continuous inclination to cover in small individuals and a seasonal component to covering in larger individuals; (c) opportunistic, with multiple types of covering materials employed based on availability; and (d) functionally costly, as it significantly reduces mobility. We largely rule out the paradigm that light induces covering or at least clearly marginalize it as a trigger or effector. Our results and those of other studies of the behavioural repertoire of S. droebachiensis, are consistent with the notion that covering serves a complementary function to mitigation of hydrodynamic forces. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that covering in S. droebachiensis primarily serves a mechanical protection function, whereby the species shields its body surface to protect its external sensory, defensive, and locomotory organs against physical contact with moving debris.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Zoology
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-026-00616-3
Primary Topic
Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drivers and functional consequences of covering in a pervasive marine grazer (green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis)

Patrick Gagnon, Chantelle R. Clermont
Frontiers in Zoology
Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
article

Drivers and functional consequences of covering in a pervasive marine grazer (green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis)

Patrick Gagnon, Chantelle R. Clermont
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The circumpolar green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, exhibits a fascinating behaviour, termed "covering", which consists of coating the body with materials collected in the environment. The lack of a consensus about the drivers of covering in green sea urchin and their relative importance prevents accurate predictions about the frequency and intensity of the behaviour and its functional consequences in a globally changing ocean climate. We paired an experiment in an oscillatory wave tank with green sea urchins collected from an extensive sea urchin barren in southeastern Newfoundland (Canada), and a 3-mo survey of this barrens, to examine individual and interactive effects of wave action, light, sea urchin body size, and types of covering materials on sea urchin's displacement and covering. RESULTS: Our findings establish that covering in S. droebachiensis is: (a) predominantly controlled by hydrodynamic forces, with the existence of water current-induced covering tipping points; (b) ontogenetically determined, with a continuous inclination to cover in small individuals and a seasonal component to covering in larger individuals; (c) opportunistic, with multiple types of covering materials employed based on availability; and (d) functionally costly, as it significantly reduces mobility. We largely rule out the paradigm that light induces covering or at least clearly marginalize it as a trigger or effector. Our results and those of other studies of the behavioural repertoire of S. droebachiensis, are consistent with the notion that covering serves a complementary function to mitigation of hydrodynamic forces. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that covering in S. droebachiensis primarily serves a mechanical protection function, whereby the species shields its body surface to protect its external sensory, defensive, and locomotory organs against physical contact with moving debris.

Frontiers in Zoology
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Drivers and functional consequences of covering in a pervasive marine grazer (green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) — Patrick Gagnon, Chantelle R. Clermont · Frontiers in Zoology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS