Perceptions of Bandwagon and Hardcore Sport Fans

In two studies we examined the perceptions of bandwagon fans—those whose interest is inconsistent or contingent upon a team’s current performance—and hardcore sport fans—those with a persistent and unflinching zeal for their team even through periods of poor performance. In both studies, participants were randomly assigned to read about a bandwagon or hardcore basketball fan prior to rating their perception of the target person’s trustworthiness (likability, honesty, expertise) and personality (big five dimensions). Additionally, we assessed several possible mediators of the effect of manipulating fan type on perceived fan trustworthiness: perceived genuineness, consistency, prototypicality of the target as a fan, and the target’s presumed fanship and fandom identification. The results of both studies showed that hardcore fans were perceived more positively than bandwagon fans. Mediation analyses suggest that perceived genuineness (Studies 1 & 2), consistency, prototypicality, fanship, and fandom (Study 2) may all be factors driving this effect. The results provide empirical evidence for the positive perception of hardcore (vs. bandwagon) fans and, more importantly, suggest important mechanisms for fan perception.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication & Sport
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795261457386
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of Bandwagon and Hardcore Sport Fans

Stephen Reysen, Courtney N. Plante
Communication & Sport
Sports, Gender, and Society
article

Perceptions of Bandwagon and Hardcore Sport Fans

Stephen Reysen, Courtney N. Plante
article en

Abstract

In two studies we examined the perceptions of bandwagon fans—those whose interest is inconsistent or contingent upon a team’s current performance—and hardcore sport fans—those with a persistent and unflinching zeal for their team even through periods of poor performance. In both studies, participants were randomly assigned to read about a bandwagon or hardcore basketball fan prior to rating their perception of the target person’s trustworthiness (likability, honesty, expertise) and personality (big five dimensions). Additionally, we assessed several possible mediators of the effect of manipulating fan type on perceived fan trustworthiness: perceived genuineness, consistency, prototypicality of the target as a fan, and the target’s presumed fanship and fandom identification. The results of both studies showed that hardcore fans were perceived more positively than bandwagon fans. Mediation analyses suggest that perceived genuineness (Studies 1 & 2), consistency, prototypicality, fanship, and fandom (Study 2) may all be factors driving this effect. The results provide empirical evidence for the positive perception of hardcore (vs. bandwagon) fans and, more importantly, suggest important mechanisms for fan perception.

Communication & Sport
Bishop's University (CA), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Sports, Gender, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.