Influence of Input Data Composition and Measurement Errors on Computational Model‐Mediated Assessment of Cardiovascular Properties: An In Silico Study

The integration of computational cardiovascular models with clinical data through parameter estimation algorithms represents a promising approach for quantitative cardiovascular assessment. However, the sensitivity of assessment to variations in the composition of and measurement errors in input clinical data remains insufficiently understood. In this study, we utilized a cardiovascular model to generate in silico datasets representing diverse virtual subjects. From these datasets, hemodynamic data mimicking noninvasive clinical measurements were extracted as inputs for the parameter estimation algorithm (herein the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm), while the corresponding values of model parameters representing key cardiovascular properties (e.g., arterial stiffness, cardiac function, and vascular resistance) served as the ground truth for evaluating the accuracy of parameter estimation. The obtained results showed that input datasets comprising brachial arterial blood pressures and flow velocities in the ascending aorta and four peripheral arteries (supplying major organs/tissues) enabled accurate parameter estimation. Cardiovascular models reassigned with the estimated parameter values precisely replicated the input data and predicted other important hemodynamic variables (e.g., aortic blood pressure). While these capabilities were largely maintained upon the omission of flow velocity data in a single peripheral artery, they were significantly compromised when flow velocity data in two peripheral arteries were removed. Furthermore, the introduction of measurement errors into the input data substantially increased errors in both parameter estimation and hemodynamic prediction. In summary, this study underscores the importance of rigorous clinical data selection and high-precision in vivo measurements for enhancing the reliability of computational model-mediated cardiovascular assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.70181
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Input Data Composition and Measurement Errors on Computational Model‐Mediated Assessment of Cardiovascular Properties: An In Silico Study

Zhaojun Li, Di Sun, Zhicheng Zhang, Fuyou Liang
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
article

Influence of Input Data Composition and Measurement Errors on Computational Model‐Mediated Assessment of Cardiovascular Properties: An In Silico Study

Zhaojun Li, Di Sun, Zhicheng Zhang, Fuyou Liang
article en

Abstract

The integration of computational cardiovascular models with clinical data through parameter estimation algorithms represents a promising approach for quantitative cardiovascular assessment. However, the sensitivity of assessment to variations in the composition of and measurement errors in input clinical data remains insufficiently understood. In this study, we utilized a cardiovascular model to generate in silico datasets representing diverse virtual subjects. From these datasets, hemodynamic data mimicking noninvasive clinical measurements were extracted as inputs for the parameter estimation algorithm (herein the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm), while the corresponding values of model parameters representing key cardiovascular properties (e.g., arterial stiffness, cardiac function, and vascular resistance) served as the ground truth for evaluating the accuracy of parameter estimation. The obtained results showed that input datasets comprising brachial arterial blood pressures and flow velocities in the ascending aorta and four peripheral arteries (supplying major organs/tissues) enabled accurate parameter estimation. Cardiovascular models reassigned with the estimated parameter values precisely replicated the input data and predicted other important hemodynamic variables (e.g., aortic blood pressure). While these capabilities were largely maintained upon the omission of flow velocity data in a single peripheral artery, they were significantly compromised when flow velocity data in two peripheral arteries were removed. Furthermore, the introduction of measurement errors into the input data substantially increased errors in both parameter estimation and hemodynamic prediction. In summary, this study underscores the importance of rigorous clinical data selection and high-precision in vivo measurements for enhancing the reliability of computational model-mediated cardiovascular assessment.

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical EngineeringVol. 42(6)
Sechenov University (RU), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Tongren Hospital (CN), Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN), Shanghai Ocean University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.