Protector of the Party: The Political Logic of Protest Repression in Post-Apartheid South Africa

This paper investigates the political logic of protest repression in post-apartheid South Africa, arguing that as the African National Congress (ANC) faces electoral decline, it deploys strategic and selective coercion to manage opposition. Using protest data from ACLED (2014–2024) merged with electoral and demographic information, I show that repression isnot uniformly applied but disproportionately targets movements aligned with electorally threatening actors, such as the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and student movements. By integrating statistical analysis with qualitative illustrations, the paper reveals how protest policing functions as a tool of partisan maintenance under democratic decline. The studycontributes to scholarship on repression in electoral regimes, highlighting how dominant parties manipulate state institutions not to eliminate dissent broadly, but to selectively suppress actors with the capacity to reshape the distribution of political power. South Africa’s experience offers broader implications for understanding how long-ruling parties resist political erosion without overtly violating democratic norms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/k56j-4t75
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protector of the Party: The Political Logic of Protest Repression in Post-Apartheid South Africa

Winston Ardoin
UNC Libraries
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Protector of the Party: The Political Logic of Protest Repression in Post-Apartheid South Africa

Winston Ardoin
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the political logic of protest repression in post-apartheid South Africa, arguing that as the African National Congress (ANC) faces electoral decline, it deploys strategic and selective coercion to manage opposition. Using protest data from ACLED (2014–2024) merged with electoral and demographic information, I show that repression isnot uniformly applied but disproportionately targets movements aligned with electorally threatening actors, such as the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and student movements. By integrating statistical analysis with qualitative illustrations, the paper reveals how protest policing functions as a tool of partisan maintenance under democratic decline. The studycontributes to scholarship on repression in electoral regimes, highlighting how dominant parties manipulate state institutions not to eliminate dissent broadly, but to selectively suppress actors with the capacity to reshape the distribution of political power. South Africa’s experience offers broader implications for understanding how long-ruling parties resist political erosion without overtly violating democratic norms.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.