Operating theatre nurses’ experiences of feedback on intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries related to surgical positioning: A descriptive survey study

This study explored operating theatre nurses' experiences of receiving feedback on intraoperatively acquired positioning-related injuries and organisational factors influencing these processes. A descriptive cross-sectional web-based survey was completed by 57 Swedish operating theatre nurses using a study-specific questionnaire grounded in patient-safety frameworks. Most respondents had encountered positioning-related injuries, yet structured feedback was uncommon: over half received feedback only occasionally, and one-third never received any. When incidents were reported, feedback was often infrequent or absent. Although feedback was rated highly important for clinical practice, reporting, and positioning safety, responsibility for providing it was perceived as unclear. Barriers included limited interdepartmental collaboration, unclear routines, and time constraints, whereas facilitators included cross-unit collaboration, defined feedback responsibilities, and leadership support. Some nurses reported resorting to impermissible access to patient records to obtain outcome information. The findings indicate a need for systematic, leadership-supported feedback structures that strengthen organisational learning, ensure legal compliance, and enhance perioperative patient safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Perioperative Practice
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589261450077
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operating theatre nurses’ experiences of feedback on intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries related to surgical positioning: A descriptive survey study

Ami Fagerdahl, Matilda Thunmarker, Lubava Jasnopolski
Journal of Perioperative Practice
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

Operating theatre nurses’ experiences of feedback on intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries related to surgical positioning: A descriptive survey study

Ami Fagerdahl, Matilda Thunmarker, Lubava Jasnopolski
article en

Abstract

This study explored operating theatre nurses' experiences of receiving feedback on intraoperatively acquired positioning-related injuries and organisational factors influencing these processes. A descriptive cross-sectional web-based survey was completed by 57 Swedish operating theatre nurses using a study-specific questionnaire grounded in patient-safety frameworks. Most respondents had encountered positioning-related injuries, yet structured feedback was uncommon: over half received feedback only occasionally, and one-third never received any. When incidents were reported, feedback was often infrequent or absent. Although feedback was rated highly important for clinical practice, reporting, and positioning safety, responsibility for providing it was perceived as unclear. Barriers included limited interdepartmental collaboration, unclear routines, and time constraints, whereas facilitators included cross-unit collaboration, defined feedback responsibilities, and leadership support. Some nurses reported resorting to impermissible access to patient records to obtain outcome information. The findings indicate a need for systematic, leadership-supported feedback structures that strengthen organisational learning, ensure legal compliance, and enhance perioperative patient safety.

Journal of Perioperative Practice
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Blekingesjukhuset (SE), Region Blekinge (SE), Stockholm South General Hospital (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.