Motivations for pursuing multiple genetic risk assessments and responses to receiving identical risk results

Abstract Genetic testing is increasingly used to identify people at increased risk for future health conditions. As clinical practice guidelines and science evolve, undergoing repeat genetic counseling and potentially repeat testing may be beneficial to receive updated recommendations. Yet, it remains unclear why people would consent to additional testing after receiving results from prior testing. We conducted semi‐structured interviews with 17 participants from a national genomics study who had received a high‐risk result from prior genetic testing to explore their motivations for participating in additional and potentially repetitive genetic tests. Interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed, and anonymized. Using consensus‐based coding, two team members conducted reflexive thematic analysis. Final themes were identified through a recursive process. Participants valued genetic testing as a tool to learn information about future health risks that is otherwise inaccessible or unknown to them. They were inclined to participate to verify that no new risks had emerged and that their risk management actions were appropriate. They acknowledged the evolving genetic landscape, with a few saying they received updated medical recommendations based on their known risk from the genomics study. Most felt relief after receiving the same test results, serving as validation that they are on the “right path” to maintaining their health. This study illustrates that people may engage in additional genetic testing to cope with downstream effects of having an increased risk. Genetic counselors and clinicians should take care to acknowledge the evolving genetic landscape in early and ongoing conversations with their patients and discuss the importance of sustained genetic counseling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70238
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motivations for pursuing multiple genetic risk assessments and responses to receiving identical risk results

Courtney L. Scherr, Alina Majid, Laura J. Rasmussen‐Torvik, Elizabeth M. McNally et al.
Journal of Genetic Counseling
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Motivations for pursuing multiple genetic risk assessments and responses to receiving identical risk results

Courtney L. Scherr, Alina Majid, Laura J. Rasmussen‐Torvik, Elizabeth M. McNally, Christin Hoell, Savanna Kerstiens, Rex Chisholm
article en

Abstract

Abstract Genetic testing is increasingly used to identify people at increased risk for future health conditions. As clinical practice guidelines and science evolve, undergoing repeat genetic counseling and potentially repeat testing may be beneficial to receive updated recommendations. Yet, it remains unclear why people would consent to additional testing after receiving results from prior testing. We conducted semi‐structured interviews with 17 participants from a national genomics study who had received a high‐risk result from prior genetic testing to explore their motivations for participating in additional and potentially repetitive genetic tests. Interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed, and anonymized. Using consensus‐based coding, two team members conducted reflexive thematic analysis. Final themes were identified through a recursive process. Participants valued genetic testing as a tool to learn information about future health risks that is otherwise inaccessible or unknown to them. They were inclined to participate to verify that no new risks had emerged and that their risk management actions were appropriate. They acknowledged the evolving genetic landscape, with a few saying they received updated medical recommendations based on their known risk from the genomics study. Most felt relief after receiving the same test results, serving as validation that they are on the “right path” to maintaining their health. This study illustrates that people may engage in additional genetic testing to cope with downstream effects of having an increased risk. Genetic counselors and clinicians should take care to acknowledge the evolving genetic landscape in early and ongoing conversations with their patients and discuss the importance of sustained genetic counseling.

Journal of Genetic CounselingVol. 35(3)
Northwestern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.