Statistical Methods for Dynamic Treatment Regimes with Survival Outcomes and Dose-Finding Designs

Improving patient outcomes in clinical research requires statistical methods tailored to distinct goals of therapeutic development. Early-phase trials must balance safety and efficacy when evaluating treatments, while chronic disease management requires strategies to guide individualized treatment decisions over time. This proposal highlights statistical methods in development to address these complementary challenges in modern biomedical research. The first part introduces a method for estimating optimal long-term treatment strategies for time-to-event outcomes using generalized survival random forests with a model re-fitting approach, accommodating varying patient histories while maximizing expected survival time. This is supported by theoretical results, simulation studies, and real-world application to pediatric Crohn’s disease data. The second part develops an improved methodology for Phase 1/2 trials by advancing utility-based dose selection to an alterative involving a monotone function of safety and efficacy. Simultaneously, a delayed-outcomes framework was also proposed to consider trial speed. This is supported by extensive simulation studies using a variety of random scenarios. The third part extends this work to combination therapy trials, and includes settings with ordinal treatment responses. Collectively, these methods advance the design and evaluation of clinical strategies across the health domain. By improving dose selection in early-phase trials and enabling robust estimation and validation of dynamic treatment regimes for chronic disease management, this work contributes practical tools to support safer, more effective, and personalized patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/mbat-em85
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical Methods for Dynamic Treatment Regimes with Survival Outcomes and Dose-Finding Designs

Jane She
UNC Libraries
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Statistical Methods for Dynamic Treatment Regimes with Survival Outcomes and Dose-Finding Designs

Jane She
article en

Abstract

Improving patient outcomes in clinical research requires statistical methods tailored to distinct goals of therapeutic development. Early-phase trials must balance safety and efficacy when evaluating treatments, while chronic disease management requires strategies to guide individualized treatment decisions over time. This proposal highlights statistical methods in development to address these complementary challenges in modern biomedical research. The first part introduces a method for estimating optimal long-term treatment strategies for time-to-event outcomes using generalized survival random forests with a model re-fitting approach, accommodating varying patient histories while maximizing expected survival time. This is supported by theoretical results, simulation studies, and real-world application to pediatric Crohn’s disease data. The second part develops an improved methodology for Phase 1/2 trials by advancing utility-based dose selection to an alterative involving a monotone function of safety and efficacy. Simultaneously, a delayed-outcomes framework was also proposed to consider trial speed. This is supported by extensive simulation studies using a variety of random scenarios. The third part extends this work to combination therapy trials, and includes settings with ordinal treatment responses. Collectively, these methods advance the design and evaluation of clinical strategies across the health domain. By improving dose selection in early-phase trials and enabling robust estimation and validation of dynamic treatment regimes for chronic disease management, this work contributes practical tools to support safer, more effective, and personalized patient care.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.