Influence of Peri-implant Bone Defects and Implant Diameter on Primary Stability: An In Vitro Study

Abstract Objective This in vitro study evaluated the impact of circumferential peri-implant bone defects on the mechanical stability of dental implants with different diameters under varying bone density conditions. Materials and Methods A total of sixty Helix GM ® titanium implants (3.5 mm and 4.3 mm in diameter) were inserted into standardized synthetic polyurethane blocks designed to simulate low (10 PCF), medium (20 PCF), and high (30 PCF) bone densities. For each bone density, half of the implants were placed in defect-free sites (controls), whereas the remaining implants had standardized cup-shaped peri-implant defects replicating bone loss commonly associated with peri-implantitis. Primary implant stability was quantified through insertion torque (IT) and removal torque (RT) measurements, and statistical comparisons were performed. Results Implant diameter and bone density significantly influenced implant stability ( p < 0.05). In defect-free sites, 4.3 mm implants showed higher insertion torque values than 3.5 mm implants across all densities, reaching mean values of 31.9 vs. 22.0 N·cm (10 PCF), 34.2 vs. 21.6 N·cm (20 PCF), and 46.8 vs. 31.1 N·cm (30 PCF). The presence of peri-implant defects resulted in a marked reduction in stability. Insertion torque for 4.3 mm implants decreased from 31.9 N·cm to 3.2 N·cm in low-density bone and from 46.8 N·cm to 21.6 N·cm in high-density bone. Similar reductions were observed for removal torque values. Conclusions Circumferential peri-implant bone defects significantly reduce implant mechanical stability, particularly in low-density bone conditions. Larger-diameter implants demonstrated superior stability across all bone densities, suggesting a potential biomechanical advantage in compromised bone environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-026-03073-x
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Peri-implant Bone Defects and Implant Diameter on Primary Stability: An In Vitro Study

Valdir Gouveia Garcia, Letícia Helena Theodoro, Rafael Scaf de [UNESP] Molon, Paulo Ricardo Neves Franco
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Influence of Peri-implant Bone Defects and Implant Diameter on Primary Stability: An In Vitro Study

Valdir Gouveia Garcia, Letícia Helena Theodoro, Rafael Scaf de [UNESP] Molon, Paulo Ricardo Neves Franco
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This in vitro study evaluated the impact of circumferential peri-implant bone defects on the mechanical stability of dental implants with different diameters under varying bone density conditions. Materials and Methods A total of sixty Helix GM ® titanium implants (3.5 mm and 4.3 mm in diameter) were inserted into standardized synthetic polyurethane blocks designed to simulate low (10 PCF), medium (20 PCF), and high (30 PCF) bone densities. For each bone density, half of the implants were placed in defect-free sites (controls), whereas the remaining implants had standardized cup-shaped peri-implant defects replicating bone loss commonly associated with peri-implantitis. Primary implant stability was quantified through insertion torque (IT) and removal torque (RT) measurements, and statistical comparisons were performed. Results Implant diameter and bone density significantly influenced implant stability ( p < 0.05). In defect-free sites, 4.3 mm implants showed higher insertion torque values than 3.5 mm implants across all densities, reaching mean values of 31.9 vs. 22.0 N·cm (10 PCF), 34.2 vs. 21.6 N·cm (20 PCF), and 46.8 vs. 31.1 N·cm (30 PCF). The presence of peri-implant defects resulted in a marked reduction in stability. Insertion torque for 4.3 mm implants decreased from 31.9 N·cm to 3.2 N·cm in low-density bone and from 46.8 N·cm to 21.6 N·cm in high-density bone. Similar reductions were observed for removal torque values. Conclusions Circumferential peri-implant bone defects significantly reduce implant mechanical stability, particularly in low-density bone conditions. Larger-diameter implants demonstrated superior stability across all bone densities, suggesting a potential biomechanical advantage in compromised bone environments.

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery
Latin American Institute (RU), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.