Prophylactic Anakinra to Prevent Neurotoxicity After CAR T-Cell Therapy in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas: A Single-Center Real-World Experience

Background/Objectives: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy is an effective treatment for relapsed/refractory (r/r) aggressive B-cell lymphomas; however, acute toxicities, such as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), remain common. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of ICANS, suggesting that prophylactic anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, might reduce its incidence or severity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients with B-cell lymphomas who received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy (tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, or lisocabtagene maraleucel) at the Bern University Hospital between April 2019 and June 2022. One cohort received prophylactic anakinra (100 mg subcutaneously on days 0 to +6 post-infusion), while the comparison cohort did not. Results: The incidence of ICANS was similar between groups (14 patients, 35%) with anakinra vs. 10 (25%) in the standard cohort (p = 0.464). Rates of grade 3 ICANS were also comparable (eight (20%) vs. seven (18%), p > 0.999). Among patients who developed ICANS, median hospitalization was numerically shorter with anakinra (27 vs. 40 days, p = 0.077). Anakinra did not impair CAR T-cell expansion and was well tolerated, with no treatment-related adverse events. Survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were similar between cohorts. Conclusions: In summary, prophylactic anakinra did not reduce the incidence or severity of ICANS in our analysis; however, it may be associated with shorter hospitalization in affected patients. Whether this reflects a direct therapeutic effect or improved overall toxicity management remains uncertain. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further clarify the role of anakinra for prophylactic treatment of ICANS following CAR T-cell therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18111787
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prophylactic Anakinra to Prevent Neurotoxicity After CAR T-Cell Therapy in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas: A Single-Center Real-World Experience

Katja Seipel, Inna Shaforostova, Marie-Noelle Kronig, Tina Schmid et al.
Cancers
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Prophylactic Anakinra to Prevent Neurotoxicity After CAR T-Cell Therapy in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas: A Single-Center Real-World Experience

Katja Seipel, Inna Shaforostova, Marie-Noelle Kronig, Tina Schmid, Ulrike Bacher, Thomas Pabst
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy is an effective treatment for relapsed/refractory (r/r) aggressive B-cell lymphomas; however, acute toxicities, such as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), remain common. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of ICANS, suggesting that prophylactic anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, might reduce its incidence or severity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients with B-cell lymphomas who received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy (tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, or lisocabtagene maraleucel) at the Bern University Hospital between April 2019 and June 2022. One cohort received prophylactic anakinra (100 mg subcutaneously on days 0 to +6 post-infusion), while the comparison cohort did not. Results: The incidence of ICANS was similar between groups (14 patients, 35%) with anakinra vs. 10 (25%) in the standard cohort (p = 0.464). Rates of grade 3 ICANS were also comparable (eight (20%) vs. seven (18%), p > 0.999). Among patients who developed ICANS, median hospitalization was numerically shorter with anakinra (27 vs. 40 days, p = 0.077). Anakinra did not impair CAR T-cell expansion and was well tolerated, with no treatment-related adverse events. Survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were similar between cohorts. Conclusions: In summary, prophylactic anakinra did not reduce the incidence or severity of ICANS in our analysis; however, it may be associated with shorter hospitalization in affected patients. Whether this reflects a direct therapeutic effect or improved overall toxicity management remains uncertain. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further clarify the role of anakinra for prophylactic treatment of ICANS following CAR T-cell therapy.

CancersVol. 18(11)
University of Bern (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.