Recanalization therapy in stroke patients with malignancies: in-hospital outcomes by cancer subtype in a nationwide administrative data analysis

OBJECTIVE: Stroke is a common risk among patients with cancer, and the odds of a fatal stroke are estimated to be twice those of the general population. Due to the exclusion of cancer patients from major intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy trials, existing literature consists largely of small case series lacking sufficient statistical power. We aimed to evaluate the safety profile of acute stroke therapies in patients with active cancer, stratified by cancer localization, using a nationwide administrative dataset. METHODS: This retrospective, large-scale cohort study utilized data from the German Federal Statistical Office (DESTATIS). We analyzed all inpatient cases of acute ischemic stroke receiving recanalization therapy (intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy) in Germany. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and safety outcomes (intracranial bleeding, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and acute anemia). To control for baseline characteristics, adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We analyzed 154,333 patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis (2482 with and 151,851 without cancer) and 39,534 receiving endovascular thrombectomy (1580 with and 37,954 without cancer). In the thrombolysis cohort, patients with cancer had significantly higher rates of in-hospital death (10.88% vs. 6.26%; OR 1.83; p < 0.001) and intracranial bleeding (5.76% vs. 4.58%; OR 1.27; p = 0.005). Similarly, in the thrombectomy cohort, active cancer was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (28.10% vs. 20.00%; OR 1.56; p < 0.001) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (6.14% vs. 4.67%; OR 1.33; p = 0.007). After multivariable adjustment, stratification revealed highly heterogeneous complication profiles depending heavily on the specific cancer subtype. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale analysis demonstrates that while mortality and specific bleeding risks are generally elevated in stroke patients with malignancies, these risks depend strongly on the cancer subtype. These findings advocate for a tailored, risk-based approach to recanalization therapy, weighing individual complication profiles rather than a general exclusion of patients with cancer from acute stroke therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurology
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-13851-9
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recanalization therapy in stroke patients with malignancies: in-hospital outcomes by cancer subtype in a nationwide administrative data analysis

John‐Ih Lee, Michael Gliem, Tristan Kölsche, Tobias Ruck et al.
Journal of Neurology
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Recanalization therapy in stroke patients with malignancies: in-hospital outcomes by cancer subtype in a nationwide administrative data analysis

John‐Ih Lee, Michael Gliem, Tristan Kölsche, Tobias Ruck, Robin Jansen, Antje Schmidt‐Pogoda, Stefanie Schreiber, Sven G. Meuth, Sarah Gammersbach
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Stroke is a common risk among patients with cancer, and the odds of a fatal stroke are estimated to be twice those of the general population. Due to the exclusion of cancer patients from major intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy trials, existing literature consists largely of small case series lacking sufficient statistical power. We aimed to evaluate the safety profile of acute stroke therapies in patients with active cancer, stratified by cancer localization, using a nationwide administrative dataset. METHODS: This retrospective, large-scale cohort study utilized data from the German Federal Statistical Office (DESTATIS). We analyzed all inpatient cases of acute ischemic stroke receiving recanalization therapy (intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy) in Germany. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and safety outcomes (intracranial bleeding, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and acute anemia). To control for baseline characteristics, adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We analyzed 154,333 patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis (2482 with and 151,851 without cancer) and 39,534 receiving endovascular thrombectomy (1580 with and 37,954 without cancer). In the thrombolysis cohort, patients with cancer had significantly higher rates of in-hospital death (10.88% vs. 6.26%; OR 1.83; p < 0.001) and intracranial bleeding (5.76% vs. 4.58%; OR 1.27; p = 0.005). Similarly, in the thrombectomy cohort, active cancer was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (28.10% vs. 20.00%; OR 1.56; p < 0.001) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (6.14% vs. 4.67%; OR 1.33; p = 0.007). After multivariable adjustment, stratification revealed highly heterogeneous complication profiles depending heavily on the specific cancer subtype. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale analysis demonstrates that while mortality and specific bleeding risks are generally elevated in stroke patients with malignancies, these risks depend strongly on the cancer subtype. These findings advocate for a tailored, risk-based approach to recanalization therapy, weighing individual complication profiles rather than a general exclusion of patients with cancer from acute stroke therapies.

Journal of NeurologyVol. 273(6)
University of Münster (DE), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.