Measuring smart library maturity: evaluation methods and case studies of university libraries in China

Purpose Amid deepening digital transformation and intelligence advances, emerging technologies are reshaping libraries globally, yet regional disparities in priorities and insufficient theoretical development regarding core features and evaluative tools persist. This study aims to address these gaps by constructing a maturity evaluation indicator system and method to facilitate smart library development. Design/methodology/approach Content mining was first employed to delineate smart library connotation and components. Building on prior research, object-oriented analysis elicited initial indicators, subsequently refined through expert interviews. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and expert scoring determined indicator weights. A maturity model integrated with triangular fuzzy functions formulated the evaluation methodology. Empirical validation was conducted across five Chinese university libraries. Findings The developed indicator system encompasses 4 evaluation elements, 12 first-level indicators and 48 second-level indicators. Application to empirical cases confirmed the scientific validity and operational feasibility of the proposed evaluation model. Originality/value This study creatively integrates tools from information science, systems engineering and management science to design a validated research scheme. It proposes a systematic evaluation indicator system, establishes a maturity model with triangular fuzzy calculation and assesses five Chinese university libraries, offering a valuable methodological paradigm for smart library evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Electronic Library
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/el-09-2025-0369
Primary Topic
Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring smart library maturity: evaluation methods and case studies of university libraries in China

Xinru Zhu, Anning Zhang, Meizhen Duan
The Electronic Library
Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
article

Measuring smart library maturity: evaluation methods and case studies of university libraries in China

Xinru Zhu, Anning Zhang, Meizhen Duan
article en

Abstract

Purpose Amid deepening digital transformation and intelligence advances, emerging technologies are reshaping libraries globally, yet regional disparities in priorities and insufficient theoretical development regarding core features and evaluative tools persist. This study aims to address these gaps by constructing a maturity evaluation indicator system and method to facilitate smart library development. Design/methodology/approach Content mining was first employed to delineate smart library connotation and components. Building on prior research, object-oriented analysis elicited initial indicators, subsequently refined through expert interviews. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and expert scoring determined indicator weights. A maturity model integrated with triangular fuzzy functions formulated the evaluation methodology. Empirical validation was conducted across five Chinese university libraries. Findings The developed indicator system encompasses 4 evaluation elements, 12 first-level indicators and 48 second-level indicators. Application to empirical cases confirmed the scientific validity and operational feasibility of the proposed evaluation model. Originality/value This study creatively integrates tools from information science, systems engineering and management science to design a validated research scheme. It proposes a systematic evaluation indicator system, establishes a maturity model with triangular fuzzy calculation and assesses five Chinese university libraries, offering a valuable methodological paradigm for smart library evaluation.

The Electronic Library
Shenzhen University (CN), National Science Library (CN)
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.