Long-Term Recall Error in Retrospective Family Surveys: Cohabitation Histories in Denmark

Recall questions provide the possibility of obtaining longitudinal information in cross-sectional surveys and are often used in family research. Yet, recall instruments may suffer from measurement issues. This study links a recent cross-sectional survey that includes recall histories of all unions involving cohabitation to administrative cohabitation records for Denmark and assesses the recall error in cohabitation status histories. Under mild assumptions, it distinguishes recall error from other survey error types, allowing for assessing the increase in recall error as time to the recalled period increases. The quality of recall for living with a partner decreases in a linear fashion by 0.5-0.6% points per year on average over a 20-year period. Results are robust to a series of sensitivity tests. The presented estimate of recall error for cohabitation status likely provides a lower bound for general recall error and shows by example how regression calibration methods can be used to correct for recall error even if only a small random subset of data includes true values. Recall instruments used in family research are prone to recall error, and failing to account for this may lead to biased estimates especially for longer recall periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-026-09775-9
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-Term Recall Error in Retrospective Family Surveys: Cohabitation Histories in Denmark

Emil A.L. Simonsen, Laust Hvas Mortensen, Peter Fallesen, Jolien Cremers et al.
European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie
Family Dynamics and Relationships
article

Long-Term Recall Error in Retrospective Family Surveys: Cohabitation Histories in Denmark

Emil A.L. Simonsen, Laust Hvas Mortensen, Peter Fallesen, Jolien Cremers, Lisbeth Trille G. Loft
article en

Abstract

Recall questions provide the possibility of obtaining longitudinal information in cross-sectional surveys and are often used in family research. Yet, recall instruments may suffer from measurement issues. This study links a recent cross-sectional survey that includes recall histories of all unions involving cohabitation to administrative cohabitation records for Denmark and assesses the recall error in cohabitation status histories. Under mild assumptions, it distinguishes recall error from other survey error types, allowing for assessing the increase in recall error as time to the recalled period increases. The quality of recall for living with a partner decreases in a linear fashion by 0.5-0.6% points per year on average over a 20-year period. Results are robust to a series of sensitivity tests. The presented estimate of recall error for cohabitation status likely provides a lower bound for general recall error and shows by example how regression calibration methods can be used to correct for recall error even if only a small random subset of data includes true values. Recall instruments used in family research are prone to recall error, and failing to account for this may lead to biased estimates especially for longer recall periods.

European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie
University of Copenhagen (DK), Statistics Denmark (DK), Stockholm University (SE), Rockwool Foundation (DK)
Stockholms Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.