Accountability That Keeps on Giving: Open Issues in the Delivery of Public Services

ABSTRACT Reviewing and discussing current “hot” issues in the public accountability of public services from the different perspectives of central and local government, healthcare, universities, and third‐sector organizations, this piece aims at open a debate on how to improve both research and practice in these realms. All sectors show evidence of accountability systems under strain or failing, with persistent conflicts between the technical or quantitative aspects of accountability and broader, more qualitative dimensions. These sectors also show the problematic relationship between diminishing resources and expanding accountability demands. All such aspects are worthy of further study, including the role of multiple felt experiences and the psychological impact on individual actors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Accountability and Management
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.70042
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accountability That Keeps on Giving: Open Issues in the Delivery of Public Services

Dennis De Widt, David Yates, Anne Stafford, Florian Gebreiter et al.
Financial Accountability and Management
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Accountability That Keeps on Giving: Open Issues in the Delivery of Public Services

Dennis De Widt, David Yates, Anne Stafford, Florian Gebreiter, Mariannunziata Liguori, Lynn Bradley, Richard Baylis, Noel Hyndman, Silvia Pazzi, Jing Liu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reviewing and discussing current “hot” issues in the public accountability of public services from the different perspectives of central and local government, healthcare, universities, and third‐sector organizations, this piece aims at open a debate on how to improve both research and practice in these realms. All sectors show evidence of accountability systems under strain or failing, with persistent conflicts between the technical or quantitative aspects of accountability and broader, more qualitative dimensions. These sectors also show the problematic relationship between diminishing resources and expanding accountability demands. All such aspects are worthy of further study, including the role of multiple felt experiences and the psychological impact on individual actors.

Financial Accountability and Management
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Durham University (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University of Bristol (GB), University of York (GB), Adam Smith Institute (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), Cardiff University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.