Interaction in OHS research knowledge transfer: A rapid review

Introduction Improving Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) is crucial. Research knowledge provides an evidence base for OHS initiatives, but translating research into workplace practice is challenging. Knowledge transfer literature is rich in theory but limited on practical design of transfer activities. Stakeholder interaction is encouraged in the literature. This rapid review contributes for the first time a synthesis of interactive OHS knowledge transfer activities. Methods A search of Web of Science and PubMed identified 61 studies from 1365 publications. Analyses applied a five-point framework: 1) what knowledge, 2) to whom, 3) by whom, 4) how, 5) with what effect. Cross-tabulations provided additional detail (e.g., who transferred how?). Results Studies published 2003–2024 covered diverse OHS areas. Most results reported researchers using training or workshops to transfer evidence-based guidelines. Intermediaries mainly transferred syntheses of multiple studies as “key messages”. Few studies reported effects of transfer activities. Collaboration occurred in one in five activities. Conclusions The synthesis suggest that interactive training and workshops activities can be used by researchers to transfer research knowledge to workplace actors, while syntheses of evidence-based knowledge may be better transferred by intermediaries via knowledge brokering activities. Results highlight the varied use of interaction in OHS knowledge transfer, including low interactive approaches, art-based approaches, and novel technology. Practical Applications Findings can guide practitioners’ choice of transfer activities by audience, agent, and knowledge type, and inform appropriate levels of interaction. Additionally, it may help practitioners to reflect on the degree of interaction useful for transfer efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107296
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interaction in OHS research knowledge transfer: A rapid review

Ole Henning Sørensen, Johnny Dyreborg, Peter Aske Svendsen, Dwayne Van Eerd
Safety Science
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Interaction in OHS research knowledge transfer: A rapid review

Ole Henning Sørensen, Johnny Dyreborg, Peter Aske Svendsen, Dwayne Van Eerd
article en

Abstract

Introduction Improving Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) is crucial. Research knowledge provides an evidence base for OHS initiatives, but translating research into workplace practice is challenging. Knowledge transfer literature is rich in theory but limited on practical design of transfer activities. Stakeholder interaction is encouraged in the literature. This rapid review contributes for the first time a synthesis of interactive OHS knowledge transfer activities. Methods A search of Web of Science and PubMed identified 61 studies from 1365 publications. Analyses applied a five-point framework: 1) what knowledge, 2) to whom, 3) by whom, 4) how, 5) with what effect. Cross-tabulations provided additional detail (e.g., who transferred how?). Results Studies published 2003–2024 covered diverse OHS areas. Most results reported researchers using training or workshops to transfer evidence-based guidelines. Intermediaries mainly transferred syntheses of multiple studies as “key messages”. Few studies reported effects of transfer activities. Collaboration occurred in one in five activities. Conclusions The synthesis suggest that interactive training and workshops activities can be used by researchers to transfer research knowledge to workplace actors, while syntheses of evidence-based knowledge may be better transferred by intermediaries via knowledge brokering activities. Results highlight the varied use of interaction in OHS knowledge transfer, including low interactive approaches, art-based approaches, and novel technology. Practical Applications Findings can guide practitioners’ choice of transfer activities by audience, agent, and knowledge type, and inform appropriate levels of interaction. Additionally, it may help practitioners to reflect on the degree of interaction useful for transfer efforts.

Safety ScienceVol. 202
Health Canada (CA), National Research Centre for the Working Environment (DK), Institute for Work & Health (CA), Aalborg University (DK)
Arbejdstilsynet
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.