Older age and sex differences in the proportion of vital signs flagged as abnormal

BACKGROUND: The variability of vital signs thresholds has not been well described in relation to older age and sex assigned at birth. Significant variations may influence clinical interpretation of vital signs, most notably the thresholds at which investigations or treatments are initiated. Our objective was to compare, in stable health status, the percentage of abnormal values (flagging percentage) of standard vital signs thresholds of adults aged 45 years and older and to determine centile-based thresholds by age and sex. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from the Centre for the Integration and Analysis of Medical Data (CITADEL) at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), a tertiary care hospital. All inpatients and outpatients, from January 2012 to December 2021, were included. For individuals with multiple visits, a single hospitalization or a single outpatient visit was selected at random for inclusion. To reflect a stable health status, the last vital signs recorded before hospital discharge were selected and in-hospital deaths were excluded. Flagging percentages were identified using a quantile-based approach. Age and sex specific centile-based thresholds were determined by identifying values at the 2.5th and 97.5th centiles. Flagging percentages and centile values for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature were analyzed by age group (45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, and 85 + years) and sex. RESULTS: The sample comprised 123,420 individuals, including 90,813 inpatients. Flagging percentages for the standard threshold of upper systolic blood pressure (140 mmHg) ranged from 13.3 (12.7-13.9) % (45-54y assigned female at birth (AFAB)) to 39.8 (38.6-41.0) % (85y+ AFAB). Flagging percentages for standard thresholds ranged between 0.1 (0.1-0.2) to 1.2 (1.0-1.4) % for upper temperature (37.8°C), lower temperature (35.0°C), and lower systolic blood pressure (90 mmHg). Across subgroups, the 97.5th centile-based adapted thresholds varied between 158 (156-159) - 178 (177-180) mmHg for upper systolic blood pressure and between 37.2 (37.1-37.2) - 37.3 (37.3-37.3) °C for upper temperature. CONCLUSIONS: Important differences in vital signs flagging percentages may affect their comparability by vital sign, age, and sex. Standard thresholds may need to be reassessed using clinical outcomes to factor age and sex differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349936
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Older age and sex differences in the proportion of vital signs flagged as abnormal

Sahar Saeed, Robert Goulden, Quôc Dinh Nguyên, Jean-Philippe Émond et al.
PLoS ONE
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Older age and sex differences in the proportion of vital signs flagged as abnormal

Sahar Saeed, Robert Goulden, Quôc Dinh Nguyên, Jean-Philippe Émond, Philippe Desmarais, Christina Wolfson, Vincent Cheung, Michaël Chassé, Ariel Mundo Ortiz
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The variability of vital signs thresholds has not been well described in relation to older age and sex assigned at birth. Significant variations may influence clinical interpretation of vital signs, most notably the thresholds at which investigations or treatments are initiated. Our objective was to compare, in stable health status, the percentage of abnormal values (flagging percentage) of standard vital signs thresholds of adults aged 45 years and older and to determine centile-based thresholds by age and sex. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from the Centre for the Integration and Analysis of Medical Data (CITADEL) at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), a tertiary care hospital. All inpatients and outpatients, from January 2012 to December 2021, were included. For individuals with multiple visits, a single hospitalization or a single outpatient visit was selected at random for inclusion. To reflect a stable health status, the last vital signs recorded before hospital discharge were selected and in-hospital deaths were excluded. Flagging percentages were identified using a quantile-based approach. Age and sex specific centile-based thresholds were determined by identifying values at the 2.5th and 97.5th centiles. Flagging percentages and centile values for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature were analyzed by age group (45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, and 85 + years) and sex. RESULTS: The sample comprised 123,420 individuals, including 90,813 inpatients. Flagging percentages for the standard threshold of upper systolic blood pressure (140 mmHg) ranged from 13.3 (12.7-13.9) % (45-54y assigned female at birth (AFAB)) to 39.8 (38.6-41.0) % (85y+ AFAB). Flagging percentages for standard thresholds ranged between 0.1 (0.1-0.2) to 1.2 (1.0-1.4) % for upper temperature (37.8°C), lower temperature (35.0°C), and lower systolic blood pressure (90 mmHg). Across subgroups, the 97.5th centile-based adapted thresholds varied between 158 (156-159) - 178 (177-180) mmHg for upper systolic blood pressure and between 37.2 (37.1-37.2) - 37.3 (37.3-37.3) °C for upper temperature. CONCLUSIONS: Important differences in vital signs flagging percentages may affect their comparability by vital sign, age, and sex. Standard thresholds may need to be reassessed using clinical outcomes to factor age and sex differences.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(5)
Queen's University (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA), Université Laval (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.