Discriminative Index: A Novel Indicator for Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms in Laboratory Medicine

Background: Machine learning models are increasingly applied in clinical practice. However, conventional performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy do not capture the structural characteristics of predictive probability distributions, limiting their utility for optimizing decision thresholds and supporting clinical decision-making. Methods: We propose the D-index, a novel metric designed to quantify asymmetry in predicted probability distributions by measuring the difference in skewness between positive and negative predictions. The D-index was evaluated using simulated datasets with skewness-dominant and kurtosis-dominant distributions at three performance levels (AUROC = 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9). Its practical utility was further validated using real-world MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry data for predicting vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium, comparing three machine learning algorithms: deep learning, XGBoost, and random forest. Results: In simulated data, the D-index increased with model performance only in skewness-dominant distributions, demonstrating selective sensitivity to distributional asymmetry. In real-world data, the D-index distinguished models with similar conventional performance but different distributional structures. Models with higher D-index values retained a larger proportion of confidently classified cases while achieving meaningful accuracy improvements under a gray-zone strategy. In contrast, models with lower D-index values required exclusion of more cases to achieve comparable or greater accuracy gains. Conclusions: The D-index provides complementary information beyond traditional performance metrics by capturing structural properties of predictive distributions. It enables identification of models that are better suited for gray-zone strategies and supports more reliable clinical decision-making. This distribution-aware approach offers a practical tool for improving the safety, efficiency, and clinical utility of machine learning models in biomedical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111671
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discriminative Index: A Novel Indicator for Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms in Laboratory Medicine

Hsin‐Yao Wang, Martin Spüler, Jia-Ruei Yu, Markus Kostrzewa et al.
Diagnostics
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

Discriminative Index: A Novel Indicator for Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms in Laboratory Medicine

Hsin‐Yao Wang, Martin Spüler, Jia-Ruei Yu, Markus Kostrzewa, Wan-Ying Lin, Sven Brand
article en

Abstract

Background: Machine learning models are increasingly applied in clinical practice. However, conventional performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy do not capture the structural characteristics of predictive probability distributions, limiting their utility for optimizing decision thresholds and supporting clinical decision-making. Methods: We propose the D-index, a novel metric designed to quantify asymmetry in predicted probability distributions by measuring the difference in skewness between positive and negative predictions. The D-index was evaluated using simulated datasets with skewness-dominant and kurtosis-dominant distributions at three performance levels (AUROC = 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9). Its practical utility was further validated using real-world MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry data for predicting vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium, comparing three machine learning algorithms: deep learning, XGBoost, and random forest. Results: In simulated data, the D-index increased with model performance only in skewness-dominant distributions, demonstrating selective sensitivity to distributional asymmetry. In real-world data, the D-index distinguished models with similar conventional performance but different distributional structures. Models with higher D-index values retained a larger proportion of confidently classified cases while achieving meaningful accuracy improvements under a gray-zone strategy. In contrast, models with lower D-index values required exclusion of more cases to achieve comparable or greater accuracy gains. Conclusions: The D-index provides complementary information beyond traditional performance metrics by capturing structural properties of predictive distributions. It enables identification of models that are better suited for gray-zone strategies and supports more reliable clinical decision-making. This distribution-aware approach offers a practical tool for improving the safety, efficiency, and clinical utility of machine learning models in biomedical applications.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(11)
Bruker (United States) (US), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Knorr-Bremse (Germany) (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.