Clinical phenotypes of difficult-to-treat and mild asthma defined by cluster analysis

BACKGROUND: Cluster modelling has demonstrated asthma heterogeneity across disease severities, but contemporary data integrating difficult-to-treat and mild asthma with systematic assessment of comorbidity-focused treatable traits remain limited. OBJECTIVE: To identify and characterise difficult-to-treat and mild asthma clusters in two UK cohorts: Wessex AsThma CoHort of Difficult Asthma (WATCH-DA) and a mild-asthma cohort from the Epigenetics of Severe Asthma study (EOSA-MA). METHODS: Separate K-means clustering was applied to WATCH-DA (n = 498; 11 variables) and EOSA-MA (n = 67; 12 variables). Post-hoc comparisons evaluated demographic, inflammatory, physiological, comorbidity and patient-reported outcome profiles. RESULTS: Six difficult-to-treat and two mild asthma clusters were identified respectively, all Type-2 (T2)-predominant. Difficult-to-treat asthma clusters differed by sex, age of asthma-onset, body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities. Two clinically controlled clusters, cluster-1 (Early-onset atopic controlled) and cluster-4 (Late-adult-onset non-atopic controlled), showed distinct comorbidity patterns despite lower overall morbidity. Three severe, exacerbation-prone, adult-onset, female predominant difficult-to-treat clusters (Adult-onset eosinophilic exacerbator [cluster-2], Young-adult-onset high-risk exacerbator [cluster-5], Adult-onset obese multimorbid symptomatic [cluster-6]) varied by blood eosinophil counts (BEC), spirometry, BMI, treatment needs, comorbidities, and quality of life. An Adolescent-onset obese atopic obstructive (cluster-3) showed fewer exacerbations but high BEC with worst spirometry and poor asthma control. In mild asthma, cluster-1 (Early-onset atopic mild) showed worse pathophysiological indices and asthma control than cluster-2 (Adolescent-onset mild) but similarly high comorbidity prevalence. CONCLUSION: Characterisation of difficult-to-treat and mild asthma clusters reveals diverse associated clinical traits and outcomes across the asthma severity spectrum. Recognition of these clusters and their associated comorbidities should prompt early personalised asthma management to address both airway-centric and comorbid disease aspects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Research
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-026-03740-0
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical phenotypes of difficult-to-treat and mild asthma defined by cluster analysis

Judit Varkonyi-Sepp, R Djukanovic, Hans Michael Haitchi, Chellan Eames et al.
Respiratory Research
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Clinical phenotypes of difficult-to-treat and mild asthma defined by cluster analysis

Judit Varkonyi-Sepp, R Djukanovic, Hans Michael Haitchi, Chellan Eames, Grégory Seumois, Maria Larsson, A Freeman, Sara Herrera de la Mata, Mohammad Leily, J.J. Hudson-Colby, Paddy Dennison, Liuyu Wei, Elena Dabrio-Reina, Ramesh J. Kurukulaaratchy, Mohammed A. Kyyaly, Elena Vorobeva, Syed Hasan Arshad, Pandurangan Vijayanand, Adam Lewis, Ben Ainsworth, Heena Mistry, Hongmei Zhang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cluster modelling has demonstrated asthma heterogeneity across disease severities, but contemporary data integrating difficult-to-treat and mild asthma with systematic assessment of comorbidity-focused treatable traits remain limited. OBJECTIVE: To identify and characterise difficult-to-treat and mild asthma clusters in two UK cohorts: Wessex AsThma CoHort of Difficult Asthma (WATCH-DA) and a mild-asthma cohort from the Epigenetics of Severe Asthma study (EOSA-MA). METHODS: Separate K-means clustering was applied to WATCH-DA (n = 498; 11 variables) and EOSA-MA (n = 67; 12 variables). Post-hoc comparisons evaluated demographic, inflammatory, physiological, comorbidity and patient-reported outcome profiles. RESULTS: Six difficult-to-treat and two mild asthma clusters were identified respectively, all Type-2 (T2)-predominant. Difficult-to-treat asthma clusters differed by sex, age of asthma-onset, body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities. Two clinically controlled clusters, cluster-1 (Early-onset atopic controlled) and cluster-4 (Late-adult-onset non-atopic controlled), showed distinct comorbidity patterns despite lower overall morbidity. Three severe, exacerbation-prone, adult-onset, female predominant difficult-to-treat clusters (Adult-onset eosinophilic exacerbator [cluster-2], Young-adult-onset high-risk exacerbator [cluster-5], Adult-onset obese multimorbid symptomatic [cluster-6]) varied by blood eosinophil counts (BEC), spirometry, BMI, treatment needs, comorbidities, and quality of life. An Adolescent-onset obese atopic obstructive (cluster-3) showed fewer exacerbations but high BEC with worst spirometry and poor asthma control. In mild asthma, cluster-1 (Early-onset atopic mild) showed worse pathophysiological indices and asthma control than cluster-2 (Adolescent-onset mild) but similarly high comorbidity prevalence. CONCLUSION: Characterisation of difficult-to-treat and mild asthma clusters reveals diverse associated clinical traits and outcomes across the asthma severity spectrum. Recognition of these clusters and their associated comorbidities should prompt early personalised asthma management to address both airway-centric and comorbid disease aspects.

Respiratory Research
La Jolla Institute for Immunology (US), Southampton Solent University (GB), Southampton General Hospital (GB), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), University of California San Diego (US), Biomed Research Institute (US), NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (GB), St Mary's Hospital (GB), David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre (GB), St. Mary's Hospital (GB), University of Southampton (GB), University of Memphis (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.