Reforming the Game: An Alternative Model for FBS College Football

As FBS college football reaches a financial tipping point, there is growing concern that competing at the highest level of the sport is going to become an unsustainable endeavor for a large portion of current FBS universities. In response to this concern, lobbying efforts, alternative competition models, and alternative governance structures have explored a future for college football that includes greater financial and competitive equity across the entire sport. To this point, no centralized governance model has taken hold, lobbying efforts have been futile, and scheduling remains under the same conference umbrella it has long existed in. The construction of this model is built upon a variety of factors, including the financial, operational, and legal concerns under a new governance and financial model. By delineating an alternative competitive and governance structure, this study aims to provide administrators, commissioners, university presidents, and coaches with a workable alternative model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/wbsq-5316
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reforming the Game: An Alternative Model for FBS College Football

Branch Knight
UNC Libraries
Sports, Gender, and Society
article

Reforming the Game: An Alternative Model for FBS College Football

Branch Knight
article en

Abstract

As FBS college football reaches a financial tipping point, there is growing concern that competing at the highest level of the sport is going to become an unsustainable endeavor for a large portion of current FBS universities. In response to this concern, lobbying efforts, alternative competition models, and alternative governance structures have explored a future for college football that includes greater financial and competitive equity across the entire sport. To this point, no centralized governance model has taken hold, lobbying efforts have been futile, and scheduling remains under the same conference umbrella it has long existed in. The construction of this model is built upon a variety of factors, including the financial, operational, and legal concerns under a new governance and financial model. By delineating an alternative competitive and governance structure, this study aims to provide administrators, commissioners, university presidents, and coaches with a workable alternative model.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Sports, Gender, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.