Discussion of Different Formulas for the Same Quantities Within a Catenary–Based Overhead Line Design in the International Literature

Abstract For the accurate planning of overhead lines, a catenary–based calculation is used, because the conductor curve in the span takes the shape of the catenary. On the other hand, there is a parabola–based calculation, which is considered approximate and is usually applied in the case of overhead line with spans up to 400 metres, since the difference between the catenary and the parabola is then almost negligible. While there are generally no differences in important formulas for parabola–based calculations in different literature, some important formulas differ in the case of the catenary–based calculations. This article deals with the interpretation and evaluation of such different formulas for the same quantities and provides a clear answer regarding the usability of the examined formulas in different literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
B&H eletrical engineering
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/bhee-2026-0023
Primary Topic
Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discussion of Different Formulas for the Same Quantities Within a Catenary–Based Overhead Line Design in the International Literature

Tatjana Konjić, Alen Hatibovic, Milenko Tomic, Martin Ćalasan
B&H eletrical engineering
Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
article

Discussion of Different Formulas for the Same Quantities Within a Catenary–Based Overhead Line Design in the International Literature

Tatjana Konjić, Alen Hatibovic, Milenko Tomic, Martin Ćalasan
article en

Abstract

Abstract For the accurate planning of overhead lines, a catenary–based calculation is used, because the conductor curve in the span takes the shape of the catenary. On the other hand, there is a parabola–based calculation, which is considered approximate and is usually applied in the case of overhead line with spans up to 400 metres, since the difference between the catenary and the parabola is then almost negligible. While there are generally no differences in important formulas for parabola–based calculations in different literature, some important formulas differ in the case of the catenary–based calculations. This article deals with the interpretation and evaluation of such different formulas for the same quantities and provides a clear answer regarding the usability of the examined formulas in different literature.

B&H eletrical engineering
University of Tuzla (BA), Institute of Metrology of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BA), Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (US), University of Bihać (BA), University of Montenegro (ME)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.