Validating the reliability and validity of the Fear of Cancer Scale (FOCS) in the general population based on modified classical test theory and analyzing its risk factors

To validate the reliability, validity, and applicability of the Fear of Cancer Scale (FOCS) for identifying individuals in the entire Chinese general population at high risk for cancer-related fear, and to analyze the current status and risk factors associated with general population fear of cancer. Using the modified classical test theory, a total of 3963 participants were recruited from the entire Chinese general population from January to October 2024 to validate FOCS. Delphi expert consultation, item analysis and cognitive interview were used to validate the content and face validity of FOCS. Factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used to test the structural validity of FOCS. Cronbach alpha coefficient, Spearman-Brown coefficient were used to test the internal consistency reliability of FOCS. Multiple stepped-linear regression was used to analyze the risk factors of cancer-related fear in the general population. The FOCS of 17 items was divided into 3 dimensions: 8 items for direct fear, 6 items for indirect fear, and 3 items for latent fear. The three-factor correlation model's FOCS demonstrated strong validity (root mean square error of approximate = 0.042, goodness of fit index = 0.974, AGFI = 0.961, comparative fit index = 0.972, normed fit index = 0.965, incremental fit index = 0.972, tucker-lewis index = 0.962), reliability (Cronbach α coefficient was 0.885, Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.674) and applicability (average completion time [298.13 ± 191.484 seconds] and effective completion rate of 91.27%). The cancer fear score of 3963 participants was 17 to 85, with M (P25, P75) was 55 (48, 63). Sex, age, occupation, and education level were found to be independent risk factors for general population cancer-related fear. The general population commonly experience significant fear of cancer-related issues, and the adjusted FOCS is effective and reliable for early identification and assessment of the level of cancer-related fear, which may provide an effective basis for cancer health education and public health services in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000049066
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating the reliability and validity of the Fear of Cancer Scale (FOCS) in the general population based on modified classical test theory and analyzing its risk factors

Z M Liu, Wan Fangyun, Gan Lin, Wang Wenxing et al.
Medicine
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Validating the reliability and validity of the Fear of Cancer Scale (FOCS) in the general population based on modified classical test theory and analyzing its risk factors

Z M Liu, Wan Fangyun, Gan Lin, Wang Wenxing, Li Feng, Zhang Jian, Wang Xuexing, Xu Jun, Yu Chunmei
article en

Abstract

To validate the reliability, validity, and applicability of the Fear of Cancer Scale (FOCS) for identifying individuals in the entire Chinese general population at high risk for cancer-related fear, and to analyze the current status and risk factors associated with general population fear of cancer. Using the modified classical test theory, a total of 3963 participants were recruited from the entire Chinese general population from January to October 2024 to validate FOCS. Delphi expert consultation, item analysis and cognitive interview were used to validate the content and face validity of FOCS. Factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used to test the structural validity of FOCS. Cronbach alpha coefficient, Spearman-Brown coefficient were used to test the internal consistency reliability of FOCS. Multiple stepped-linear regression was used to analyze the risk factors of cancer-related fear in the general population. The FOCS of 17 items was divided into 3 dimensions: 8 items for direct fear, 6 items for indirect fear, and 3 items for latent fear. The three-factor correlation model's FOCS demonstrated strong validity (root mean square error of approximate = 0.042, goodness of fit index = 0.974, AGFI = 0.961, comparative fit index = 0.972, normed fit index = 0.965, incremental fit index = 0.972, tucker-lewis index = 0.962), reliability (Cronbach α coefficient was 0.885, Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.674) and applicability (average completion time [298.13 ± 191.484 seconds] and effective completion rate of 91.27%). The cancer fear score of 3963 participants was 17 to 85, with M (P25, P75) was 55 (48, 63). Sex, age, occupation, and education level were found to be independent risk factors for general population cancer-related fear. The general population commonly experience significant fear of cancer-related issues, and the adjusted FOCS is effective and reliable for early identification and assessment of the level of cancer-related fear, which may provide an effective basis for cancer health education and public health services in the future.

MedicineVol. 105(22)
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Nanchang University (CN), Kunming Medical University (CN), First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi Medical College (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (CN), The First Hospital of Kunming (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (CN), Jiangxi Pingxiang People's Hospital (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.