Governing Generative Artificial Intelligence: Institutional Policies and Guidelines at America’s Flagship Universities

This study presents a comparative policy mapping analysis of publicly available generative AI policies and guidance across America’s flagship public universities, based on documents collected in 2025 and analyzed through thematic coding informed by Clark’s Triangle of Coordination. Findings indicate a distributed governance architecture in which instructional decisions are typically delegated to the course level and supported through instructor-facing resources, while institution-level guidance emphasizes data protection, approved tools, and risk management. Although institutions vary in posture, codification, and the depth of guidance provided, the findings point to structural convergence around this shared governance model, suggesting that flagship universities are responding to generative AI in ways that reinforce established distributions of authority within public higher education systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Policy
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048261450995
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing Generative Artificial Intelligence: Institutional Policies and Guidelines at America’s Flagship Universities

Jason LaFrance
Educational Policy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Governing Generative Artificial Intelligence: Institutional Policies and Guidelines at America’s Flagship Universities

Jason LaFrance
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative policy mapping analysis of publicly available generative AI policies and guidance across America’s flagship public universities, based on documents collected in 2025 and analyzed through thematic coding informed by Clark’s Triangle of Coordination. Findings indicate a distributed governance architecture in which instructional decisions are typically delegated to the course level and supported through instructor-facing resources, while institution-level guidance emphasizes data protection, approved tools, and risk management. Although institutions vary in posture, codification, and the depth of guidance provided, the findings point to structural convergence around this shared governance model, suggesting that flagship universities are responding to generative AI in ways that reinforce established distributions of authority within public higher education systems.

Educational Policy
Appalachian State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.