Targeted regulation of abortion providers and infant mortality

Abstract Introduction Abortion restrictions on pregnant people, such as those that limit gestational age or ban abortion altogether, have been associated with infant mortality, but little is known about whether laws restricting abortion providers and clinics providing abortions have similar associations. This study examines the association between laws that restrict abortion providers, known as TRAP (targeted regulations of abortion providers) laws, and infant mortality on a state level. Methods This cross‐sectional analysis was performed utilizing 2016–2021 Phase 8 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). PRAMS data were linked with Guttmacher Institute data about state TRAP laws from 2016 to 2021. Infant death rates were calculated using PRAMS data of self‐reported infant deaths. Multivariable Poisson regression testing the association between the existence of TRAP laws in a state and infant mortality was performed, adjusting for individual‐level sociodemographic factors available in PRAMS. The exposure was defined as the existence of at least one TRAP law in a state during the study period. Results Among 178,210 participants, representing a weighted population of 9,099,586 birthing people, 47.5% people lived in states ( n = 19) that had at least one TRAP law during the study period. Overall, 0.4% of participants reported an infant death. In adjusted analysis, there was a 36% greater likelihood of infant mortality (adjusted incident rate ratio [aIRR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–1.63) in states with TRAP laws in comparison to those without TRAP laws. Conclusions TRAP laws are associated with a greater likelihood of infant mortality, even after accounting for potential individual‐level confounders. Restricted access to abortion may result in people with high‐risk maternal or fetal health conditions continuing pregnancy rather than receiving desired abortion services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pregnancy
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70320
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Targeted regulation of abortion providers and infant mortality

Joe Feinglass, Madeline F. Perry, Lynn M. Yee
Pregnancy
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Targeted regulation of abortion providers and infant mortality

Joe Feinglass, Madeline F. Perry, Lynn M. Yee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Abortion restrictions on pregnant people, such as those that limit gestational age or ban abortion altogether, have been associated with infant mortality, but little is known about whether laws restricting abortion providers and clinics providing abortions have similar associations. This study examines the association between laws that restrict abortion providers, known as TRAP (targeted regulations of abortion providers) laws, and infant mortality on a state level. Methods This cross‐sectional analysis was performed utilizing 2016–2021 Phase 8 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). PRAMS data were linked with Guttmacher Institute data about state TRAP laws from 2016 to 2021. Infant death rates were calculated using PRAMS data of self‐reported infant deaths. Multivariable Poisson regression testing the association between the existence of TRAP laws in a state and infant mortality was performed, adjusting for individual‐level sociodemographic factors available in PRAMS. The exposure was defined as the existence of at least one TRAP law in a state during the study period. Results Among 178,210 participants, representing a weighted population of 9,099,586 birthing people, 47.5% people lived in states ( n = 19) that had at least one TRAP law during the study period. Overall, 0.4% of participants reported an infant death. In adjusted analysis, there was a 36% greater likelihood of infant mortality (adjusted incident rate ratio [aIRR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–1.63) in states with TRAP laws in comparison to those without TRAP laws. Conclusions TRAP laws are associated with a greater likelihood of infant mortality, even after accounting for potential individual‐level confounders. Restricted access to abortion may result in people with high‐risk maternal or fetal health conditions continuing pregnancy rather than receiving desired abortion services.

PregnancyVol. 2(4)
Northwestern University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.