Impact of Storage Temperature and Duration on Dimensional Stability and Mechanical Properties of <scp>3D</scp> ‐Printed Implant Surgical Guides

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of storage temperature and duration on the dimensional stability and mechanical properties of 3D-printed surgical guides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty surgical guides were designed using two software programs (3Shape and SMOP) and printed with NextDent SG resin. Specimens were stored at 2°C, 20°C, and 30°C (n = 10). Scans were performed at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 weeks to assess dimensional stability by using root mean square (RMS) deviation. Additionally, 30 bar-shaped and 30 disk-shaped specimens were printed (n = 10) to evaluate flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness after 6 weeks of storage at the respective temperatures. RESULTS: Storage temperature had no significant effect on dimensional stability for 3Shape or SMOP. However, RMS values increased significantly from 2 to 6 weeks for both groups. In standardized mechanical specimens, storage temperature significantly affected flexural strength (p < 0.001) and flexural modulus (p = 0.018), but not Vickers hardness (p = 0.126). Flexural strength was highest at 30°C, while 2°C and 20°C did not differ significantly (p = 0.772). Flexural modulus was higher at 20°C than at 2°C (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Storage temperature did not affect dimensional stability or hardness but influenced flexural properties in standardized specimens. Time-dependent dimensional changes were detected. Based on mechanical data, storage at 20°C or 30°C may be preferable to refrigeration for maintaining flexural performance. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: 3D-printed surgical guides demonstrated dimensional stability across varying storage temperatures, although time-dependent deviations were detected. Based on standardized mechanical specimens, refrigeration may not provide mechanical benefits compared with room-temperature storage. Therefore, room-temperature storage may be preferable when delayed use is expected, even in warmer climates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70198
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Storage Temperature and Duration on Dimensional Stability and Mechanical Properties of 3D ‐Printed Implant Surgical Guides

Jin‐Soo Ahn, Vincent Fehmer, René Daher, Koungjin Park et al.
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Impact of Storage Temperature and Duration on Dimensional Stability and Mechanical Properties of 3D ‐Printed Implant Surgical Guides

Jin‐Soo Ahn, Vincent Fehmer, René Daher, Koungjin Park, Sung‐Jin Kim, Jae‐Hyun Lee
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of storage temperature and duration on the dimensional stability and mechanical properties of 3D-printed surgical guides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty surgical guides were designed using two software programs (3Shape and SMOP) and printed with NextDent SG resin. Specimens were stored at 2°C, 20°C, and 30°C (n = 10). Scans were performed at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 weeks to assess dimensional stability by using root mean square (RMS) deviation. Additionally, 30 bar-shaped and 30 disk-shaped specimens were printed (n = 10) to evaluate flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness after 6 weeks of storage at the respective temperatures. RESULTS: Storage temperature had no significant effect on dimensional stability for 3Shape or SMOP. However, RMS values increased significantly from 2 to 6 weeks for both groups. In standardized mechanical specimens, storage temperature significantly affected flexural strength (p < 0.001) and flexural modulus (p = 0.018), but not Vickers hardness (p = 0.126). Flexural strength was highest at 30°C, while 2°C and 20°C did not differ significantly (p = 0.772). Flexural modulus was higher at 20°C than at 2°C (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Storage temperature did not affect dimensional stability or hardness but influenced flexural properties in standardized specimens. Time-dependent dimensional changes were detected. Based on mechanical data, storage at 20°C or 30°C may be preferable to refrigeration for maintaining flexural performance. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: 3D-printed surgical guides demonstrated dimensional stability across varying storage temperatures, although time-dependent deviations were detected. Based on standardized mechanical specimens, refrigeration may not provide mechanical benefits compared with room-temperature storage. Therefore, room-temperature storage may be preferable when delayed use is expected, even in warmer climates.

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
University of Geneva (CH), Seoul National University (KR), Seoul National University Dental Hospital (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea, Seoul National University Dental Hospital
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.