Directly comparing randomized and real-world controls in adjuvant breast cancer

Aim: We sought to directly compare contemporaneous real-world (RW) and randomized controlled trial (RCT) control arms to assess the feasibility of utilizing RW controls in early breast cancer treatment. Materials & methods: Women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative high-risk breast cancer receiving adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for six cycles between 29 May 2007 and 21 November 2013 were included, mirroring the control arm and study timeframe from our reference trial ‘Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: The ABC Trials’. Structured data was extracted from the iKnowMed electronic medical record system, which included both RW and trial patients allowing for their direct comparison. Propensity scores were used for baseline characteristic balancing, and Kaplan–Meier analysis was conducted. Results: In the final sample of 306 patients (153 per arm drawn from 155 RCT patients and 703 RW patients in the study timeframe), the matching process yielded balanced cohorts along available covariates. Kaplan–Meier curves and disease-free survival distributions did not suggest significant differences between RW and trial arms (log rank p = 0.98). Conclusion: Despite limitations, including the use of structured data only, the study suggests that RW data could have served as a synthetic control in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2025-0143
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Directly comparing randomized and real-world controls in adjuvant breast cancer

Brigham Walker, Marley Boyd, Nino Balanchivadze, Nicholas J. Robert et al.
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Directly comparing randomized and real-world controls in adjuvant breast cancer

Brigham Walker, Marley Boyd, Nino Balanchivadze, Nicholas J. Robert, Michelle Silver, Junxin Shi, Purva Bulsara
article en

Abstract

Aim: We sought to directly compare contemporaneous real-world (RW) and randomized controlled trial (RCT) control arms to assess the feasibility of utilizing RW controls in early breast cancer treatment. Materials & methods: Women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative high-risk breast cancer receiving adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for six cycles between 29 May 2007 and 21 November 2013 were included, mirroring the control arm and study timeframe from our reference trial ‘Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: The ABC Trials’. Structured data was extracted from the iKnowMed electronic medical record system, which included both RW and trial patients allowing for their direct comparison. Propensity scores were used for baseline characteristic balancing, and Kaplan–Meier analysis was conducted. Results: In the final sample of 306 patients (153 per arm drawn from 155 RCT patients and 703 RW patients in the study timeframe), the matching process yielded balanced cohorts along available covariates. Kaplan–Meier curves and disease-free survival distributions did not suggest significant differences between RW and trial arms (log rank p = 0.98). Conclusion: Despite limitations, including the use of structured data only, the study suggests that RW data could have served as a synthetic control in this setting.

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Tulane University (US), EADA Business School (ES), Virginia Oncology Associates (US), Genesis Medical Center (US), Genesis Research Institute (JP), The US Oncology Network (US), TriNetX (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.