Discordance between observer and patient-reported shared decision-making in inflammatory bowel disease: A multicenter cross-sectional study

Abstract Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Optimal management of this condition requires collaboration between patients and physicians, a process known as shared decision-making (SDM). In this study, we aim to evaluate the quality of SDM in gastroenterology clinics in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Methods: This multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2024 and December 2025. Audio recordings of gastroenterology visits were independently assessed by two reviewers using the validated Observing Patient Involvement in Decision-Making (OPTION-5) scale. Moreover, patients evaluated their encounters using the 9-item SDM Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). A multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of SDM from both the patient and physician perspectives. Results: A total of 105 encounters from three hospitals were analyzed with a median OPTION-5 score of 5 out of 100 (IQR 0–10). A multivariate linear regression analysis showed that longer consultation duration in minutes ( β = 1.88, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.21–3.56, P = 0.028) and the decision to start a new medication ( β = 24.86, 95% CI: 17.24–32.48, P < 0.001) were independently associated with higher total OPTION-5 scores. There was no significant correlation between observer-rated OPTION-5 scores and patient-reported SDM-Q-9 scores (Spearman’s ρ = –0.044, P = 0.687), indicating discordance between externally assessed and patient-perceived shared decision-making. Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with IBD from three centers in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, observer-rated SDM was low. Multiple factors were significantly associated with the level of SDM, including longer consultation duration and decision to start new medication. Further studies to determine interventions that can enhance SDM are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_99_26
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discordance between observer and patient-reported shared decision-making in inflammatory bowel disease: A multicenter cross-sectional study

Turki AlAmeel, Dimah A. Alaskar, Ayman A. Sakr, Eman S. Al Sulais et al.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Discordance between observer and patient-reported shared decision-making in inflammatory bowel disease: A multicenter cross-sectional study

Turki AlAmeel, Dimah A. Alaskar, Ayman A. Sakr, Eman S. Al Sulais, Mohammmed A. AlBesher, Zahra A. Al Saeed
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Optimal management of this condition requires collaboration between patients and physicians, a process known as shared decision-making (SDM). In this study, we aim to evaluate the quality of SDM in gastroenterology clinics in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Methods: This multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2024 and December 2025. Audio recordings of gastroenterology visits were independently assessed by two reviewers using the validated Observing Patient Involvement in Decision-Making (OPTION-5) scale. Moreover, patients evaluated their encounters using the 9-item SDM Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). A multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of SDM from both the patient and physician perspectives. Results: A total of 105 encounters from three hospitals were analyzed with a median OPTION-5 score of 5 out of 100 (IQR 0–10). A multivariate linear regression analysis showed that longer consultation duration in minutes ( β = 1.88, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.21–3.56, P = 0.028) and the decision to start a new medication ( β = 24.86, 95% CI: 17.24–32.48, P < 0.001) were independently associated with higher total OPTION-5 scores. There was no significant correlation between observer-rated OPTION-5 scores and patient-reported SDM-Q-9 scores (Spearman’s ρ = –0.044, P = 0.687), indicating discordance between externally assessed and patient-perceived shared decision-making. Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with IBD from three centers in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, observer-rated SDM was low. Multiple factors were significantly associated with the level of SDM, including longer consultation duration and decision to start new medication. Further studies to determine interventions that can enhance SDM are warranted.

Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Royal Commission for Jubail and Yanbu (SA), Saad Specialist Hospital (SA), King Fahad Specialist Hospital (SA), King Fahad Hospital Hufūf (SA), Menoufia University (EG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.