Corrigendum: Decoding organisational attractiveness: a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article Vatankhah S., Roodbari H., Rahimi R. and Oraee A. (2025), “Decoding organisational attractiveness: a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach”. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 37 No. 2 pp. 560–579, doi: Link to the cited article mistakenly reported an error in section 5.1 when referring to the inclusion criteria as 0.791; the correct version should read as follows and aligns with the value already shown in Table 4: “All remaining criteria met the inclusion criteria (i.e. α∼ ≥ 0.785) and were used as the basis for the categorisation”. Further, the Abstract mistakenly reports “5 criteria and 22 sub-criteria”; the correct version should read as follows and is reflected in the hierarchy and FAHP analysis: “This study identifies 5 criteria and 21 sub-criteria for OA, with job characteristics and person-job fit as most critical”. The article’s findings, theoretical contributions, and conclusions remain intact. The authors sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused.

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-05-2026-0801
Primary Topic
Employer Branding and e-HRM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corrigendum: Decoding organisational attractiveness: a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach

International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
Employer Branding and e-HRM
article

Corrigendum: Decoding organisational attractiveness: a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach

article en

Abstract

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article Vatankhah S., Roodbari H., Rahimi R. and Oraee A. (2025), “Decoding organisational attractiveness: a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach”. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 37 No. 2 pp. 560–579, doi: Link to the cited article mistakenly reported an error in section 5.1 when referring to the inclusion criteria as 0.791; the correct version should read as follows and aligns with the value already shown in Table 4: “All remaining criteria met the inclusion criteria (i.e. α∼ ≥ 0.785) and were used as the basis for the categorisation”. Further, the Abstract mistakenly reports “5 criteria and 22 sub-criteria”; the correct version should read as follows and is reflected in the hierarchy and FAHP analysis: “This study identifies 5 criteria and 21 sub-criteria for OA, with job characteristics and person-job fit as most critical”. The article’s findings, theoretical contributions, and conclusions remain intact. The authors sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused.

International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Employer Branding and e-HRM
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.