Influence of Soil and Land‐Use/Land‐Cover Data Quality on <scp>SWAT</scp> Parameter Transferability in Small Subtropical Agricultural Watersheds

ABSTRACT Regionalisation of hydrological model parameters is a cornerstone of Prediction in Ungauged Basins (PUB), yet the level of input‐data detail required for reliable parameter transfer remains unclear, particularly in intensively managed agricultural landscapes with intra‐annual land‐use/land‐cover (LULC) dynamics associated with multi‐cropping systems. While recent studies have primarily focused on refining transfer techniques—such as proximity, similarity, regression, fuzzy clustering, or machine learning—the role of watershed descriptor quality has rarely been explored. Here, we evaluated how soil and LULC data quality control the transferability of SWAT parameters through a factorial proxy‐basin experiment in two small subtropical agricultural watersheds in southern Brazil (WS80: 0.80 km 2 , WS140: 1.39 km 2 ). Four scenarios crossed two levels of soil data quality (global HWSD at 1:5000000 vs. locally sampled at approximately 1:50000) with two levels of LULC representation (static default management vs. dynamic, EVI2‐derived crop–livestock rotations). Calibration performance improved in WS80 from NSE = 0.16 under coarse soil and static LULC to NSE = 0.75 when dynamic LULC was included. Under direct parameter transfer, the combined fine‐soil and dynamic‐LULC scenario achieved satisfactory NSE in both target directions (0.56 and 0.55), compared with NSE = 0.06–0.25 under the baseline global‐soil/static‐LULC scenario. Post‐transfer PBIAS ranged from −67.2% to +48.8% across coarse‐soil scenarios, whereas the fine‐soil/dynamic‐LULC scenario reduced PBIAS to −39.9% and + 28.7%. Our findings show that, in small managed agricultural watersheds, improving the physical realism of watershed descriptors can substantially increase SWAT parameter transferability, and that both soil and dynamic LULC upgrades are needed to achieve satisfactory model performance with transferred parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70570
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Soil and Land‐Use/Land‐Cover Data Quality on SWAT Parameter Transferability in Small Subtropical Agricultural Watersheds

Cristiano Gabriel Persch, André Pellegrini, Rutinéia Tassi, Latif Kalin et al.
Hydrological Processes
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Influence of Soil and Land‐Use/Land‐Cover Data Quality on SWAT Parameter Transferability in Small Subtropical Agricultural Watersheds

Cristiano Gabriel Persch, André Pellegrini, Rutinéia Tassi, Latif Kalin, Danilo Rheinheimer dos Santos, Daniel G. A. Piccilli, Elzon C. Rippel, Lueni Gonçalves Terra
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Regionalisation of hydrological model parameters is a cornerstone of Prediction in Ungauged Basins (PUB), yet the level of input‐data detail required for reliable parameter transfer remains unclear, particularly in intensively managed agricultural landscapes with intra‐annual land‐use/land‐cover (LULC) dynamics associated with multi‐cropping systems. While recent studies have primarily focused on refining transfer techniques—such as proximity, similarity, regression, fuzzy clustering, or machine learning—the role of watershed descriptor quality has rarely been explored. Here, we evaluated how soil and LULC data quality control the transferability of SWAT parameters through a factorial proxy‐basin experiment in two small subtropical agricultural watersheds in southern Brazil (WS80: 0.80 km 2 , WS140: 1.39 km 2 ). Four scenarios crossed two levels of soil data quality (global HWSD at 1:5000000 vs. locally sampled at approximately 1:50000) with two levels of LULC representation (static default management vs. dynamic, EVI2‐derived crop–livestock rotations). Calibration performance improved in WS80 from NSE = 0.16 under coarse soil and static LULC to NSE = 0.75 when dynamic LULC was included. Under direct parameter transfer, the combined fine‐soil and dynamic‐LULC scenario achieved satisfactory NSE in both target directions (0.56 and 0.55), compared with NSE = 0.06–0.25 under the baseline global‐soil/static‐LULC scenario. Post‐transfer PBIAS ranged from −67.2% to +48.8% across coarse‐soil scenarios, whereas the fine‐soil/dynamic‐LULC scenario reduced PBIAS to −39.9% and + 28.7%. Our findings show that, in small managed agricultural watersheds, improving the physical realism of watershed descriptors can substantially increase SWAT parameter transferability, and that both soil and dynamic LULC upgrades are needed to achieve satisfactory model performance with transferred parameters.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 40(6)
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR), Auburn University (US)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.