Assessment of cybersecurity of the defense department taking into account best international practices

Introduction. In the context of rapid development of information technologies and the increasing complexity of cyber threats, ensuring an adequate level of cybersecurity for departmental information and communication systems (ICS), especially in the defense sector, becomes critically important. The growing dependence on ICS necessitates systematic approaches to assessing their security level. Problem statement. Existing state and international standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 (DSTU), as well as NIST methodologies and maturity models like CMMC, define cybersecurity requirements but do not provide a sufficiently formalized, compact, and adaptable assessment framework for departmental structures. The absence of a unified approach complicates comparative analysis between organizational units and the formation of an aggregated departmental-level assessment. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to develop a method for assessing cybersecurity provision in departmental ICS, enabling quantitative evaluation of implemented security measures based on the Information Security Management System (ISMS) requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. Materials and methods. The study applies system analysis, expert evaluation methods, and generalization of international cybersecurity practices. The proposed method is based on evaluating three components: documentary support (availability and relevance of policies and procedures), depth of policy content (ISO/IEC 27001-based checklists), and technical implementation (availability and deployment of security controls). The assessment uses equally weighted coefficients and aggregates results at both unit and departmental levels. Results. The study proposes a unified method that enables standardized assessment of cybersecurity provision across organizational units, identification of weaknesses in organizational, procedural, and technical domains, and comparative analysis between units. A departmental-level assessment approach based on the minimum unit score is introduced, reflecting the “weakest link” principle. The method is compatible with security profile frameworks and can be integrated with automated compliance assessment tools such as SCAP/OpenSCAP. Conclusions. The proposed method improves objectivity, repeatability, and formalization of cybersecurity assessment processes in departmental ICS. Its application enhances cybersecurity management effectiveness, ensures alignment with international standards, and provides a foundation for further development of regulatory and methodological frameworks in the protection of state information systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Communication informatization and cybersecurity systems and technologies
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58254/viti.9.2026.14.176
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of cybersecurity of the defense department taking into account best international practices

O. Mazulevskyi
Communication informatization and cybersecurity systems and technologies
Information and Cyber Security
article

Assessment of cybersecurity of the defense department taking into account best international practices

O. Mazulevskyi
article en

Abstract

Introduction. In the context of rapid development of information technologies and the increasing complexity of cyber threats, ensuring an adequate level of cybersecurity for departmental information and communication systems (ICS), especially in the defense sector, becomes critically important. The growing dependence on ICS necessitates systematic approaches to assessing their security level. Problem statement. Existing state and international standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 (DSTU), as well as NIST methodologies and maturity models like CMMC, define cybersecurity requirements but do not provide a sufficiently formalized, compact, and adaptable assessment framework for departmental structures. The absence of a unified approach complicates comparative analysis between organizational units and the formation of an aggregated departmental-level assessment. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to develop a method for assessing cybersecurity provision in departmental ICS, enabling quantitative evaluation of implemented security measures based on the Information Security Management System (ISMS) requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. Materials and methods. The study applies system analysis, expert evaluation methods, and generalization of international cybersecurity practices. The proposed method is based on evaluating three components: documentary support (availability and relevance of policies and procedures), depth of policy content (ISO/IEC 27001-based checklists), and technical implementation (availability and deployment of security controls). The assessment uses equally weighted coefficients and aggregates results at both unit and departmental levels. Results. The study proposes a unified method that enables standardized assessment of cybersecurity provision across organizational units, identification of weaknesses in organizational, procedural, and technical domains, and comparative analysis between units. A departmental-level assessment approach based on the minimum unit score is introduced, reflecting the “weakest link” principle. The method is compatible with security profile frameworks and can be integrated with automated compliance assessment tools such as SCAP/OpenSCAP. Conclusions. The proposed method improves objectivity, repeatability, and formalization of cybersecurity assessment processes in departmental ICS. Its application enhances cybersecurity management effectiveness, ensures alignment with international standards, and provides a foundation for further development of regulatory and methodological frameworks in the protection of state information systems.

Communication informatization and cybersecurity systems and technologiesVol. 1(9)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.