On the Benefits of Robo-Advice in Financial Markets

Abstract Robo-advisors are tools in financial markets that provide investors with low-cost financial advice, typically based on individual characteristics such as risk attitudes. We study the benefits of robo-advice in a ten-week portfolio choice experiment. Depending on treatment, investors either receive robo-advice, have a robo-advisor implement recommendations by default, or invest on their own. While we observe no effect of robo-advice on initial market participation, we find positive effects on continued participation. Robo-advisors also help investors avoid mistakes, increase rebalancing, and yield portfolios closer to the utility-maximising benchmark. Default implementation of recommendations performs significantly better than advice alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic Journal
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueag076
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Benefits of Robo-Advice in Financial Markets

Simon Weidenholzer, Joerg Oechssler, Marco Lambrecht
The Economic Journal
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

On the Benefits of Robo-Advice in Financial Markets

Simon Weidenholzer, Joerg Oechssler, Marco Lambrecht
article en

Abstract

Abstract Robo-advisors are tools in financial markets that provide investors with low-cost financial advice, typically based on individual characteristics such as risk attitudes. We study the benefits of robo-advice in a ten-week portfolio choice experiment. Depending on treatment, investors either receive robo-advice, have a robo-advisor implement recommendations by default, or invest on their own. While we observe no effect of robo-advice on initial market participation, we find positive effects on continued participation. Robo-advisors also help investors avoid mistakes, increase rebalancing, and yield portfolios closer to the utility-maximising benchmark. Default implementation of recommendations performs significantly better than advice alone.

The Economic Journal
University of Stavanger (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.