Implementation Science: Buzzword or Game Changer? Ten Years Later

PURPOSE: Implementation science was introduced to increase the uptake of evidence-based practices in acquired neurogenic communication disorders with the goal of transforming care for people with aphasia, dementia, and related conditions. Over time, its growing body of terminology and frameworks risks creating a parallel research-to-practice gap, distancing the field from the very improvements it was meant to achieve. This tutorial draws on 10 years of applied research and clinical work to clarify how implementation science can improve the realities of care. METHOD: This tutorial distills five practice- and research-informed lessons drawn from a decade of applied research and clinical work including: (a) get closer to how care actually happens in everyday practice, (b) design approaches that reach those most often left out of studies, (c) view fidelity and adaptation as dual processes, (d) account for organizational and systemic realities, and (e) accelerate learning through rapid small-scale cycles of change. Each lesson is illustrated with examples from prior research, and clinical applications are woven throughout to demonstrate how researchers, clinicians, and clinical leaders can adapt interventions, integrate strategies into workflow, and build capacity for sustainability. RESULTS: This tutorial identifies practical strategies for researchers, clinicians, and clinical leaders to keep evidence relevant, usable, and person centered while also advancing rigorous science. CONCLUSION: After 10 years of implementation science in neurogenic communication disorders, these lessons highlight pathways for aligning research more closely with care delivery, supporting meaningful change beyond scientific publications and across the populations served.