Ring Indenter Scleral Self-Indentation Versus Assistant-Assisted Indentation for Basal Vitrectomy in Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a ring indenter scleral self-indentation technique for basal vitrectomy under noncontact wide-angle viewing in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair compared with conventional assistant-assisted indentation. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study enrolled 99 eyes of 99 primary RRD patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with basal vitreous shaving from August 2023 to May 2025, with ≥6 months follow-up. Patients were divided into study group (52 eyes, surgeon's finger ring scleral self-indentation) and control group (47 eyes, conventional assistant-assisted indentation). Main outcomes: retinal redetachment rate, final BCVA, and shaving-induced retinal breaks (SIRBs) incidence. RESULTS: The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The retinal redetachment rate was 1.92% (1/52) in the study group and 2.13% (1/47) in the control group (P=1.000). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in BCVA after the surgery compared with the preoperative values (P<0.0001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the final BCVA (P=0.365) and BCVA improvement (P=0.168). The incidence of SIRBs was one case in each group (P=1.000). No intraoperative instrument displacement, infusion cannula dislodgement, or anesthesia-related complications occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The ring indenter scleral self-indentation technique is a safe and effective alternative to assistant-assisted indentation for basal vitreous clearance during RRD vitrectomy. This cost-effective technique eliminates the need for assistant support or chandelier illumination, offering the advantages of autonomous and precise manipulation, clear visualization, and manpower conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Retina
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004891
Primary Topic
Retinal and Macular Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ring Indenter Scleral Self-Indentation Versus Assistant-Assisted Indentation for Basal Vitrectomy in Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Huirong Pan, Liu Ren-wan, Z W Zhang, Zhang Sai-fei et al.
Retina
Retinal and Macular Surgery
article

Ring Indenter Scleral Self-Indentation Versus Assistant-Assisted Indentation for Basal Vitrectomy in Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Huirong Pan, Liu Ren-wan, Z W Zhang, Zhang Sai-fei, Ronghan Wu, Jia-Yi Wei, Mei-Qi Liu, Qin-Tuo Pan
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a ring indenter scleral self-indentation technique for basal vitrectomy under noncontact wide-angle viewing in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair compared with conventional assistant-assisted indentation. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study enrolled 99 eyes of 99 primary RRD patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with basal vitreous shaving from August 2023 to May 2025, with ≥6 months follow-up. Patients were divided into study group (52 eyes, surgeon's finger ring scleral self-indentation) and control group (47 eyes, conventional assistant-assisted indentation). Main outcomes: retinal redetachment rate, final BCVA, and shaving-induced retinal breaks (SIRBs) incidence. RESULTS: The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The retinal redetachment rate was 1.92% (1/52) in the study group and 2.13% (1/47) in the control group (P=1.000). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in BCVA after the surgery compared with the preoperative values (P<0.0001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the final BCVA (P=0.365) and BCVA improvement (P=0.168). The incidence of SIRBs was one case in each group (P=1.000). No intraoperative instrument displacement, infusion cannula dislodgement, or anesthesia-related complications occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The ring indenter scleral self-indentation technique is a safe and effective alternative to assistant-assisted indentation for basal vitreous clearance during RRD vitrectomy. This cost-effective technique eliminates the need for assistant support or chandelier illumination, offering the advantages of autonomous and precise manipulation, clear visualization, and manpower conservation.

Retina
Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Affiliated Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College (CN), Institute for Conflict Research (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Retinal and Macular Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.