Methodological concerns in the association between gut microbiota and sarcopenia: from cross‑sectional associations to statistical fragility

This commentary critically appraises the cross‑sectional study by Nasrollahizadeh et al. on gut microbiota and sarcopenia in Iranian older adults. Key limitations include; after FDR correction for twelve bacterial genera, no significant differences remained between groups; Akkermansia lost significance in sensitivity analyses; Lactobacillus showed a confidence interval including 1.00; four primer pairs lacked validation with no MIQE‑compliant efficiency data; the cross‑sectional design precludes causal inference; and no sample size justification was reported. The study offers valuable hypothesis‑generating data, but evidence remains preliminary. Future longitudinal studies with metagenomic approaches are essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-026-03415-2
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological concerns in the association between gut microbiota and sarcopenia: from cross‑sectional associations to statistical fragility

Turakulov Rustam, Sharipova Gulnihol, Nurullaev Abdukhamid, Arman Abroumand Gholami et al.
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Gut microbiota and health
article

Methodological concerns in the association between gut microbiota and sarcopenia: from cross‑sectional associations to statistical fragility

Turakulov Rustam, Sharipova Gulnihol, Nurullaev Abdukhamid, Arman Abroumand Gholami, Ulmasov Firdavs
article en

Abstract

This commentary critically appraises the cross‑sectional study by Nasrollahizadeh et al. on gut microbiota and sarcopenia in Iranian older adults. Key limitations include; after FDR correction for twelve bacterial genera, no significant differences remained between groups; Akkermansia lost significance in sensitivity analyses; Lactobacillus showed a confidence interval including 1.00; four primer pairs lacked validation with no MIQE‑compliant efficiency data; the cross‑sectional design precludes causal inference; and no sample size justification was reported. The study offers valuable hypothesis‑generating data, but evidence remains preliminary. Future longitudinal studies with metagenomic approaches are essential.

Aging Clinical and Experimental ResearchVol. 38(1)
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR), Bukhara State University (UZ), Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sino (UZ), Samarkand State Medical Institute (UZ), Semnan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gut microbiota and health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.